Using the python bindings of lhapdf I get wrong (e-303) results from lhapdf-6.5.2's lhapdf.pdfset.uncertainty(...). After downgrading to ~6.3.0 I get reasonable results again. When I get some time, I'll carefully check if it is a upstream or gentoo issue.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=618bc38b2169d7eb4dc94dc6e19444510759f02d commit 618bc38b2169d7eb4dc94dc6e19444510759f02d Author: Alexander Puck Neuwirth <alexander@neuwirth-informatik.de> AuthorDate: 2022-10-16 17:09:03 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-10-30 09:33:25 +0000 sci-physics/lhapdf: Patch CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/875386 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/873655 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/873652 Signed-off-by: Alexander Puck Neuwirth <alexander@neuwirth-informatik.de> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-physics/lhapdf/files/lhapdf-6.5.2-py.patch | 11 +++++++++++ sci-physics/lhapdf/lhapdf-6.5.2.ebuild | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Given bug 875386, would it be worth masking that version?
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=44e79d7f7890a630b260f47270db9d4e510dc608 commit 44e79d7f7890a630b260f47270db9d4e510dc608 Author: Alexander Puck Neuwirth <alexander@neuwirth-informatik.de> AuthorDate: 2023-03-20 13:16:26 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-03-22 01:16:46 +0000 sci-physics/lhapdf: add 6.5.4 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/875386 Signed-off-by: Alexander Puck Neuwirth <alexander@neuwirth-informatik.de> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-physics/lhapdf/Manifest | 1 + sci-physics/lhapdf/lhapdf-6.5.4.ebuild | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
