Does flashrom still need libusb 0.x (virtual/libusb:0)? It looks like it might support libusb 1 as of 2016: https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom/commit/e49edbb8989abe206d144e4ae7bc9f7ae636bada. Please update the dep in a new revision to virtual/libusb:1 if it works.
Given only a single programmer still requires virtual/libusb:0, I am aretty sure this has been an omission. Will double-check just to be sure, though.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=673fdc1be76c120e36829af338a4c43d84ead765 commit 673fdc1be76c120e36829af338a4c43d84ead765 Author: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-10-02 20:54:12 +0000 Commit: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-10-02 21:06:30 +0000 sys-apps/flashrom: do not depend on virtual/libusb:0 There was only a single programmer which still depended on that version of libusb, and it builds fine against virtual/libusb:1. In fact, even before this change upstream build scripts happily ignored libusb-0 and only linked against libusb-1 even with pickit2-spi support enabled! Straight-to-stable revbump because as mentioned above, the dependency in question was not actually used. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/873769 Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> sys-apps/flashrom/{flashrom-1.2-r3.ebuild => flashrom-1.2-r4.ebuild} | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
