gcc-12.1.0.ebuild has arrived in prefix tree. a good thing. may i propose 2 changes that were necessary for my prefix installation and have worked well here for some time now. 1st. EAPI should be set to 8, as in main gentoo. if, for whatever reason, this seems not feasible, TOOLCHAIN_PATCH_SUFFIX=xz must be added to the settings of PATCH_VER etc. otherwise the toolchain fails to fetch the gentoo patchset files. 2nd. the sys-libs/glibc dependency should be guarded further. i am running, on top of some x86_64 linux, classic, i.e. non-rap prefix and so do not have installed sys-libs/glibc. from looking at virtual/libc, i propose: RDEPEND="!prefix-guest? ( elibc_glibc? ( sys-libs/glibc[cet(-)?] ) )" (and leave it to the knowlegeable discretion of the user if an eventual setting of the cet USE flag for his prefix gcc makes sense...) thanks, regards, fritz
I ran into prefix' portage not supporting EAPI=8 or something, so I dropped it to 7, and re-ran the patchsets to bz2. Now I get why this appeared such a mess. The RDEPEND suggestion is good, I'll try to address them soon.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/proj/prefix.git/commit/?id=18a9f3cf4f5ceb7b72fea4ce24b352ba7794b200 commit 18a9f3cf4f5ceb7b72fea4ce24b352ba7794b200 Author: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-06-16 05:52:11 +0000 Commit: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-06-16 05:52:11 +0000 sys-devel/gcc-12.1.0: use EAPI=8, fix PDEPEND Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/851714 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.30, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> sys-devel/gcc/Manifest | 4 ++-- sys-devel/gcc/gcc-12.1.0.ebuild | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
