In 65679c86bec8982d7a95220891d2438ffc63a192 (https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/dev-python/cryptography?id=65679c86bec8982d7a95220891d2438ffc63a192) the dependency logic for dev-python/cryptography was "fixed". However, due to the fact the dependency dev-python/cffi is now listed *only* in DEPEND and no longer in RDEPEND, this commit results in dev-python/cffi not being considered as a runtime dependency when installing dev-python/cryptography from a binary package. https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/dependencies/ notices: "Note that when installing from a binary package, only RDEPEND will be checked. It is therefore necessary to include items even if they are also listed in DEPEND." Please move the dev-python/cffi dependency code back to RDEPEND, so it gets pulled in when emerging dev-python/cryptography from a binary package. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. `emerge --buildpkg dev-python/cryptography` 2. `emerge -C dev-python/cffi` 3. `emerge -pvK dev-python/cryptography` Actual Results: dev-python/cffi not considered for merger. Expected Results: dev-python/cffi being pulled in the depedency graph of dev-python/cryptography. Workaround: manually installing dev-python/cffi is possible, but not practical e.g. in Continuous Integration situations. Dependencies should just work.
Yep, I know how they work, just a mistake.
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > Yep, I know how they work, just a mistake. (The mistake was when fixing BDEPEND vs DEPEND, not actually intending to drop it from RDEPEND...)
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c00d4a688a3abf6b9f6cb0635aada62d2f33599b commit c00d4a688a3abf6b9f6cb0635aada62d2f33599b Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-06-05 10:16:14 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-06-05 10:17:17 +0000 dev-python/cryptography: fix CFFI RDEPEND Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/849785 Fixes: 65679c86bec8982d7a95220891d2438ffc63a192 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../{cryptography-37.0.2.ebuild => cryptography-37.0.2-r1.ebuild} | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> Yep, I know how they work, just a mistake. Sorry, I wasn't trying to be condescending or otherwise negative, just to clarify it possibly for other readers coming across this bug report too :) Thank you for the quick fix! Keep up the good work :)
