Possibly by accident? Not a big deal, but some like me may still use gcc-9 for arm-none-eabi and also regression testing. A stable version is appreciated. Reproducible: Always
(In reply to David Flogeras from comment #0) > Possibly by accident? Not a big deal, but some like me may still use gcc-9 > for arm-none-eabi and also regression testing. A stable version is > appreciated. > > Reproducible: Always I guess we can just call 9.5.0 stable and it is what it is, given it's EOL.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7f06f467642d69ac28867c3acdab02d09a7e4b17 commit 7f06f467642d69ac28867c3acdab02d09a7e4b17 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-06-03 02:25:28 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-06-03 02:25:30 +0000 sys-devel/gcc: stabilize 9.5.0 Please don't actually use this unless you need to. It's EOL. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/849314 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sys-devel/gcc/gcc-9.5.0.ebuild | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
