Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 845318 - net-im/gajim-1.4.0 upgrade doesn't remove the plugin_installer plugin
Summary: net-im/gajim-1.4.0 upgrade doesn't remove the plugin_installer plugin
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Hanno Böck
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2022-05-18 08:45 UTC by korte
Modified: 2022-05-29 15:11 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description korte 2022-05-18 08:45:10 UTC
gajim reports a crash when starting. Upstream the bug was closed https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/10877#note_205480

> Seems the Gentoo upgrade process doesn't remove the plugin_installer plugin. This plugin isn't necessary anymore with Gajim 1.4.0


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 korte 2022-05-18 08:52:04 UTC
(In reply to korte from comment #0)
> gajim reports a crash when starting. Upstream the bug was closed
> https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/10877#note_205480
> 
> > Seems the Gentoo upgrade process doesn't remove the plugin_installer plugin. This plugin isn't necessary anymore with Gajim 1.4.0
> 
> 
> Reproducible: Always

After deactivating the Plugin Installer I get no error anymore. Removing the plugin isn't possible:

> Unable to properly remove the plugin
> [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'remote.py'"
Comment 2 Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2022-05-20 16:19:35 UTC
I'm not entirely sure I understand what this report is about.

The plugin_installer was part of gajim 1.3.3_p2, it is not part of gajim 1.4.0. Thus it gets removed after the update.

Maybe there are situations in which an extra copy of the plugin installer is installed in the homedir? But I wouldn't know how we should handle that (and that really should be up to gajim to handle properly).
Comment 3 korte 2022-05-23 03:48:13 UTC
https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/10877#note_205571
> So, this should be fixed in 1.4.2?

https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/10877#note_205572
> yeah we should make a release soon
Comment 4 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2022-05-29 15:11:03 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=eb8e26a22c0cb096ccf45c6f9f0bf15877262bc1

commit eb8e26a22c0cb096ccf45c6f9f0bf15877262bc1
Author:     Hanno Böck <hanno@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2022-05-29 15:10:57 +0000
Commit:     Hanno Böck <hanno@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2022-05-29 15:10:57 +0000

    net-im/gajim: Version bump
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/845318
    Signed-off-by: Hanno Böck <hanno@gentoo.org>
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.30, Repoman-3.0.3

 net-im/gajim/Manifest           |  1 +
 net-im/gajim/gajim-1.4.2.ebuild | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)