Is this "new" license a duplicate? Is it free?
Fedora say that is MIT https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocm-smi/blob/rawhide/f/rocm-smi.spec#_6
It looks like BSD but there are (old) files installed with MIT license. 5.0.2 is already updated to include MIT too. https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/dev-util/rocm-smi?id=1751e08cc123a50bbf4cc56ee6851e57cdce3641 As to NCSA-AMD, there are some files with custom copyright attribution and an issue opened: https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/rocm_smi_lib/issues/97 also: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rocm-smi-lib Licenses: custom:NCSAOSL As to is it free, it's not added to any free license groups so I assumed that doesn't make it a "free" license. Although maybe it should be added to the restricted list.
This is a strange hybrid of MIT and BSD: The first paragraph and the warranty disclaimer are taken from MIT, with the 3 BSD clauses between them. Should be added to @MISC-FREE AFAICS.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ae2dcceb98fab78f8a1a344883ff24e8af232c40 commit ae2dcceb98fab78f8a1a344883ff24e8af232c40 Author: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-03-14 16:10:25 +0000 Commit: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-03-14 16:26:17 +0000 profiles: add NCSA-AMD to license_groups Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/834983 Signed-off-by: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> profiles/license_groups | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
