Hi William, you adopted docker-compose for the v2/Go stuff in https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=163302873825547&w=2. Could you bump it to 2.x and handle the maintenance there? Thanks!
That would rock, thanks in advance!
*** Bug 804867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
@sping: Do you suggest slotting this or should I replace docker-compose-1.x on systems?
(In reply to William Hubbs from comment #3) > @sping: > Do you suggest slotting this or should I replace docker-compose-1.x on > systems? I'd prefer slotting. The bug and feature set are not identical, e.g. I know of some setups that 2.x cannot handle that 1.x can. Would that work for you? There is some chance the resulting file set is even free of overlaps, e.g. I think the binary location is different. Maybe you can have both slots installed in parallel even without much of a cost to the ebuild.
I think you are right about 1.x and 2.x being installed at the same time with no issues, so I'll take a look at slotting.
Cool, thank you!
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=32b399df99a600dfc343a1d4ff72c10c2d6d1982 commit 32b399df99a600dfc343a1d4ff72c10c2d6d1982 Author: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-03-15 17:19:37 +0000 Commit: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-03-15 17:24:22 +0000 app-containers/docker-compose: add 2.3.3 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/834872 Signed-off-by: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> app-containers/docker-compose/Manifest | 2 + .../docker-compose/docker-compose-2.3.3.ebuild | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
Thank you @William!
