net-im/ejabberd-21.04 (latest stable) builds but fails to start with dev-erlang/jose-1.10.1 (latest stable), and requires 1.11. See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992998
Thanks for your report. If I understand it correctly, then it's not ejabberd per se who needs a newer jose version, it's Erlang OTP 24: If you run ejabberd, more or less irregardless which version, under Erlang OTP 24, then you need dev-erlang/jose-1.11.2.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=dbd1fc42329593521f0920d32f166132720399d1 commit dbd1fc42329593521f0920d32f166132720399d1 Author: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-03-02 22:01:00 +0000 Commit: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-03-02 22:04:41 +0000 dev-erlang/jose: add 1.11.2 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/834322 Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org> dev-erlang/jose/Manifest | 1 + dev-erlang/jose/jose-1.11.2.ebuild | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
@luke-jr: I've pushed jose-1.11.2. Could you test if ejabberd 21.04 works with this jose version? If so, then I guess we will raise the dependency requirement for all ejabberd versions (and drop ejabberd-20.04).
(In reply to Florian Schmaus from comment #3) > @luke-jr: I've pushed jose-1.11.2. Could you test if ejabberd 21.04 works > with this jose version? If so, then I guess we will raise the dependency > requirement for all ejabberd versions (and drop ejabberd-20.04). 1.11.1 already seems to be working fine. The only issue is that it let me install it with 1.10.1, which didn't work. I wouldn't drop the older ejabberd just yet, though. The first day of using 21.04, I had some lost messages. Haven't been able to reproduce consistently, so not sure if it's a regression or just a one time glitch.
(In reply to Luke-Jr from comment #4) > I wouldn't drop the older ejabberd just yet, though. The first day of using > 21.04, I had some lost messages. Haven't been able to reproduce > consistently, so not sure if it's a regression or just a one time glitch. Yeah, ejabberd is on the fritz today :( Going to have to downgrade it
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=0f5e3486955f3a22d2e999d0d3cb11d8396b68d1 commit 0f5e3486955f3a22d2e999d0d3cb11d8396b68d1 Author: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-03-23 08:25:37 +0000 Commit: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-03-23 08:33:50 +0000 net-im/ejabberd: depend on newer jose Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/834322 Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org> net-im/ejabberd/{ejabberd-21.12.ebuild => ejabberd-21.12-r1.ebuild} | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
