Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 832828 - sys-apps/apparmor-utils-3.0.1 stabilization requested
Summary: sys-apps/apparmor-utils-3.0.1 stabilization requested
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Michael Palimaka (kensington)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: CC-ARCHES, PullRequest
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2022-02-07 07:49 UTC by genBTC
Modified: 2022-03-05 08:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
sys-apps/apparmor-utils-3.0.1 amd64 sys-apps/apparmor-3.0.1 amd64
Runtime testing required: ---
nattka: sanity-check+


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description genBTC 2022-02-07 07:49:48 UTC
sys-apps/apparmor-utils-3.0.1 stabilization requested

libapparmor-3.0.1 is stable, but the apparmor-utils to go along with it is not available in stable.  Since these two need to be paired with each other, the keyword mismatch does not fit.

I also do not see any open bugs that would prevent stabilization from occuring, other than a minor QA warning for DISUTILS https://bugs.gentoo.org/803086

Thank you.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2022-02-07 08:35:04 UTC
For context, libapparmor was stabilised on request by the maintainer of a reverse dependency. There's a couple of other packages (sys-apps/apparmor and sec-policy/apparmor-profiles) that are also useful and not stabilised.

I won't block stabilisation if it's specifically wanted, but I'm not sure if AppApparmor's support in Gentoo really warrants it.
Comment 2 micks 2022-02-08 10:41:39 UTC
I second this.

Due to the tight coupling of libapparmor and apparmor-utils it would make sense to have them on the same "stable" level.

Cheers
Comment 3 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2022-02-26 04:56:10 UTC
More people use it than I expected, tbh. IMO it's okay to stable it as long as people want it and it seems to work okay. I don't think it needs to be perfect as long as it's not a regression which it won't be here.
Comment 4 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev 2022-02-26 06:12:32 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 5 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2022-03-05 00:05:00 UTC
amd64 done

all arches done
Comment 6 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2022-03-05 08:28:42 UTC
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=eb852de3f6d7cbbe12ed9a8a9c007e0b30407d2d

commit eb852de3f6d7cbbe12ed9a8a9c007e0b30407d2d
Author:     Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2022-03-05 07:48:04 +0000
Commit:     Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2022-03-05 08:28:38 +0000

    profiles/arch/amd64/package.use.stable.mask: remove lxd[apparmor] mask
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/832828
    Signed-off-by: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org>
    Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/24409

 profiles/arch/amd64/package.use.stable.mask | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)