Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 831022 - x11-misc/xaos-4.2.1_p20210828 fails to compile: make: lrelease-qt5: No such file or directory
Summary: x11-misc/xaos-4.2.1_p20210828 fails to compile: make: lrelease-qt5: No such f...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Science Related Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2022-01-11 15:29 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2022-01-15 12:41 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,41.69 KB, text/plain)
2022-01-11 15:29 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-01-11 15:29:14 UTC
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: x11-misc/xaos-4.2.1_p20210828 fails to compile.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci)

NOTE:
If you think this is a GCC-11 related issue, please block bug 732706.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-01-11 15:29:16 UTC
Created attachment 761909 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2022-01-11 15:43:43 UTC
I doubt existing dependency declarations are complete, i.e. more than linguist-tools BDEPEND is missing.
Comment 3 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2022-01-11 17:22:12 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1087885199bf55e46ea492665fb508dc28003867

commit 1087885199bf55e46ea492665fb508dc28003867
Author:     Andrew Ammerlaan <andrewammerlaan@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2022-01-11 15:32:51 +0000
Commit:     Andrew Ammerlaan <andrewammerlaan@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2022-01-11 17:22:08 +0000

    x11-misc/xaos: add missing dependencies
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/831022
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.30, Repoman-3.0.3
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Ammerlaan <andrewammerlaan@gentoo.org>

 x11-misc/xaos/xaos-4.2.1_p20210828.ebuild | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Comment 4 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2022-01-11 17:28:02 UTC
Nope.
Comment 5 Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan gentoo-dev 2022-01-13 15:28:05 UTC
(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #2)
> I doubt existing dependency declarations are complete, i.e. more than
> linguist-tools BDEPEND is missing.

What exactly do you think is still missing? I've seen no further complaints from the Tinderbox so we should be fine I think.
Comment 6 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2022-01-15 12:12:02 UTC
Andrew, this is slightly disappointing. We do not rely on tinderbox for packaging and I've even given you a hint on what exactly is missing after all.

You do *not* fix anything by depending on dev-qt/qtchooser. It installs a handful of links to binaries that may or may not exist.

I don't see linking to dev-qt/qtopengl.

I still see linking to dev-qt/qtcore which is not reflected in RDEPEND.
Comment 7 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2022-01-15 12:37:18 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=00ea7a1b9e5aec3c489daea9c28058fabdb497ac

commit 00ea7a1b9e5aec3c489daea9c28058fabdb497ac
Author:     Andrew Ammerlaan <andrewammerlaan@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2022-01-15 12:36:12 +0000
Commit:     Andrew Ammerlaan <andrewammerlaan@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2022-01-15 12:37:14 +0000

    x11-misc/xaos: fix the BDEPEND
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/831022
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.30, Repoman-3.0.3
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Ammerlaan <andrewammerlaan@gentoo.org>

 x11-misc/xaos/xaos-4.2.1_p20210828.ebuild | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comment 8 Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan gentoo-dev 2022-01-15 12:41:03 UTC
> You do *not* fix anything by depending on dev-qt/qtchooser. It installs a 
> handful of links to binaries that may or may not exist.

And this I didn't know, now I do (I just did a 'equery b /usr/bin/lrelease', found qtchooser and assumed that was the package I was looking for). 

Next time I make a mistake, please just tell me what is wrong and why, just a "Nope." is not really helpful.