I know ~amd64 is for unstable, but this rc1 is really early on, both from upstream and for the gentoo packages. It's not even announced on upstream site. This is especially important as one can NOT go back to 5.1.*, files (some, not all) are overidden and aren't compatible. Reproducible: Always
Yeah, that seems pretty reasonable.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ec8bf30c0f540de8225851ef94000503158be260 commit ec8bf30c0f540de8225851ef94000503158be260 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:58:00 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:58:00 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-templates: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-templates/kicad-templates-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 6 +++++- sci-electronics/kicad-templates/kicad-templates-9999.ebuild | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=710052f8e8ae73f4d5755bafa6b8a869cc1442c6 commit 710052f8e8ae73f4d5755bafa6b8a869cc1442c6 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:57:39 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:57:39 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-symbols: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-symbols/kicad-symbols-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 6 +++++- sci-electronics/kicad-symbols/kicad-symbols-9999.ebuild | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=bb3e80975e3bf36d01d779f9b53306eeab902321 commit bb3e80975e3bf36d01d779f9b53306eeab902321 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:57:07 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:57:21 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-packages3d: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-packages3d/kicad-packages3d-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 6 +++++- sci-electronics/kicad-packages3d/kicad-packages3d-9999.ebuild | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=5b9388b0ce05158247f7a24a2c3faa9bb7394aaa commit 5b9388b0ce05158247f7a24a2c3faa9bb7394aaa Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:56:55 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:56:55 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-meta: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-meta/kicad-meta-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7999ac1003926e8b0315a0ecee469c37b2cea922 commit 7999ac1003926e8b0315a0ecee469c37b2cea922 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:56:18 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:56:18 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-footprints: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-footprints/kicad-footprints-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 6 +++++- sci-electronics/kicad-footprints/kicad-footprints-9999.ebuild | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=d77c2f1fb6e5f51b1a6ee6a0b979d76ce17a6330 commit d77c2f1fb6e5f51b1a6ee6a0b979d76ce17a6330 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:53:52 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:53:52 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad/kicad-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 5 ++++- sci-electronics/kicad/kicad-9999.ebuild | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c05c336ff2d215f8cdd09b1fa977be82d475160d commit c05c336ff2d215f8cdd09b1fa977be82d475160d Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 02:00:42 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 02:00:42 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-templates: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-templates/kicad-templates-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 2 +- sci-electronics/kicad-templates/kicad-templates-9999.ebuild | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=879dee2fdf2ad24db7279c42f7e95ed4a49ea547 commit 879dee2fdf2ad24db7279c42f7e95ed4a49ea547 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 02:00:07 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 02:00:07 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-packages3d: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-packages3d/kicad-packages3d-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 2 +- sci-electronics/kicad-packages3d/kicad-packages3d-9999.ebuild | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c5ebe10ac25f5126873e78a362d987814a1aaa1e commit c5ebe10ac25f5126873e78a362d987814a1aaa1e Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:59:52 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:59:52 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-meta: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-meta/kicad-meta-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7ef373737f90672f3e8b8a97eebffc60ce281291 commit 7ef373737f90672f3e8b8a97eebffc60ce281291 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:59:32 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:59:32 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-footprints: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-footprints/kicad-footprints-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 2 +- sci-electronics/kicad-footprints/kicad-footprints-9999.ebuild | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=348abaa9733807621f6ae7b0ed407a53cbd313c5 commit 348abaa9733807621f6ae7b0ed407a53cbd313c5 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:59:17 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:59:17 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad/kicad-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 2 +- sci-electronics/kicad/kicad-9999.ebuild | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=d8fb782d47173d60346cde3b581d53ae67341388 commit d8fb782d47173d60346cde3b581d53ae67341388 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-29 01:59:02 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-29 01:59:02 +0000 sci-electronics/kicad-symbols: drop keywords for 6.0.0_rc1 While upstream have quite a slow release cadence (which is why I was open to adding the RC), we should probably avoid exposing the RC to people by default. Drop keywords for _rc versions (for now, anyway). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827816 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/kicad-symbols/kicad-symbols-6.0.0_rc1.ebuild | 2 +- sci-electronics/kicad-symbols/kicad-symbols-9999.ebuild | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
thanks though it's too late for me :-)
(In reply to Thomas Capricelli from comment #4) > thanks > though it's too late for me :-) apologies Thomas
apologies, partially my fault. final release is expected around xmas so it's not that far away. Yes 6.0 is not backwards compatible with 5.1. Hopefully you have backups prior to this
