Please stabilize this version to be able to delete version 4.2.0.17.089.1709 which use the deprecated EAPI 5. Reproducible: Always
Sanity check failed: > dev-db/sqldeveloper-21.2.1.204.1703 > rdepend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/x32 (2 total) > >=dev-java/openjdk-8:*[javafx] > rdepend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (15 total) > >=dev-java/openjdk-8:*[javafx]
Sanity check failed: > dev-db/sqldeveloper-21.2.1.204.1703 > rdepend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/x32 (2 total) > >=dev-java/openjdk-8:*[javafx] > rdepend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (14 total) > >=dev-java/openjdk-8:*[javafx]
Unable to check for sanity: > no match for package: dev-db/sqldeveloper-21.2.1.204.1703
Sanity check failed: > dev-db/sqldeveloper-21.4.1.349.1822 > rdepend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/x32 (2 total) > >=dev-java/openjdk-8:*[javafx] > rdepend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (14 total) > >=dev-java/openjdk-8:*[javafx]
Unable to check for sanity: > no match for package: dev-db/sqldeveloper-21.4.1.349.1822
Sanity check failed: > dev-db/sqldeveloper-21.4.2.018.1706 > rdepend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/x32 (2 total) > >=dev-java/openjdk-8:*[javafx] > rdepend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (14 total) > >=dev-java/openjdk-8:*[javafx]
Unable to check for sanity: > no match for package: dev-db/sqldeveloper-21.4.2.018.1706
Sanity check failed: > dev-db/sqldeveloper-21.4.3.063.0100 > rdepend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/x32 (2 total) > <dev-java/openjdk-17:*[javafx] > rdepend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (14 total) > <dev-java/openjdk-17:*[javafx]
Current amd64 stable version 4.2.0.17.089.1709 requires sqldeveloper-4.2.0.17.089.1709-no-jre.zip which is not available anymore on oracle.com. Current ~amd64 unstable version fail with emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "<dev-java/openjdk-17:*[javafx]" as already reported. USE flag javafx seems to be masked.
(In reply to Massimo Burcheri from comment #11) > as already reported. USE flag javafx seems to be masked. Yes because dev-java/openjfx package is yet masked. You can unmask javafx use flag on dev-java/openjdk package with /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask.
Where can the sqldeveloper-21.4.3.063.0100-no-jre.zip distfile be found? I don't see it at the location indicated in pkg_nofetch(): https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/sql-developer/overview/index.html
(In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #13) > Where can the sqldeveloper-21.4.3.063.0100-no-jre.zip distfile be found? I > don't see it at the location indicated in pkg_nofetch(): > https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/sql-developer/overview/ > index.html You should click 'SQL Developper' button and then download zip file for 'Other Platforms'. There is also a direct link [1]. However you need an oracle account to download it. [1] https://download.oracle.com/otn/java/sqldeveloper/sqldeveloper-21.4.3.063.0100-no-jre.zip
(In reply to Marco Genasci from comment #14) I see. Maybe update the URL in the nofetch message then? https://www.oracle.com/tools/downloads/sqldev-downloads.html
You won't get a good sanity check for x86 because openjdk[javafx] is package.use.masked there. Let's try with amd64 only.
(In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #15) > (In reply to Marco Genasci from comment #14) > > I see. Maybe update the URL in the nofetch message then? > https://www.oracle.com/tools/downloads/sqldev-downloads.html I change it in my overlay for the next release. (In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #17) > You won't get a good sanity check for x86 because openjdk[javafx] is > package.use.masked there. Let's try with amd64 only. It's already amd64 only (KEYWORDS="-* ~amd64") the problem is that dev-java/openjfx isn't stable.
@gyakovlev: Is the following message in profiles/arch/amd64/package.use.stable.mask still valid? If it is, then we must close this bug as CANTFIX. # Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> (2021-05-07) # openjfx:8 will never be stabilized # openjfx:11 probably will neither dev-java/openjdk:8 javafx dev-java/openjdk:11 javafx
sorry for delay. there are absolutely no plans on stabilizing jfx8 or 11. however, if jfx17 gets added - we can stabilize that one, as it receives security support and will work with openjdk11 and 17, not 8 though. adding it is a big struggle though and I don't have neither time nor willpower to do that at the moment.
(In reply to Georgy Yakovlev from comment #20) @Marco Genasci: I suggest closing this bug as CANTFIX then. Dependencies are not stable, so there is nothing that could be done here.
