Thanks.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=00f8a8d3436191353b21ced8f6e4fb71c2260415 commit 00f8a8d3436191353b21ced8f6e4fb71c2260415 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-10-06 02:53:28 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-10-06 02:53:28 +0000 profiles: add bug reference to OCaml 4.13 mask Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/816498 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=d60e7b0bd94ae1298663bece100196179af12507 commit d60e7b0bd94ae1298663bece100196179af12507 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-02-27 23:49:30 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-02-27 23:49:30 +0000 profiles: unmask OCaml 4.13 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/816498 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
Should it be masked again due to #834484?