https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/ Issue: games-emulation/ppsspp-1.11.3_p20210627 fails to compile. Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci) NOTE: This machine uses GCC-11: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html If you think this is a GCC-11 related issue, please block bug 732706.
Created attachment 722143 [details] build.log build log and emerge --info
Possible context of error(s): /var/tmp/portage/games-emulation/ppsspp-1.11.3_p20210627/work/ppsspp-ff2a6eeda2d00210f1a1f7bc0ab0ad99e7bc60b6/SDL/SDLVulkanGraphicsContext.cpp:84:78: error: ‘union SDL_SysWMinfo::<unnamed>’ has no member named ‘x11’
Looks like it needs [X] on libsdl2 too, didn't catch that one.
(In reply to Ionen Wolkens from comment #3) > Looks like it needs [X] on libsdl2 too, didn't catch that one. Could you create a commit adding it? It would be much faster this way.
(In reply to Maciej Barć from comment #4) > (In reply to Ionen Wolkens from comment #3) > > Looks like it needs [X] on libsdl2 too, didn't catch that one. > > Could you create a commit adding it? It would be much faster this way. Sure, if that's what you want.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=8797c55d52293c099febfaaf1267ece3d9dee965 commit 8797c55d52293c099febfaaf1267ece3d9dee965 Author: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-07-06 11:46:12 +0000 Commit: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-07-06 11:49:05 +0000 games-emulation/ppsspp: add missing libsdl2[X] when USE=-qt5 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/800725 Acked-by: Maciej Barć <xgqt@riseup.net> Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org> ...ppsspp-1.11.3_p20210627.ebuild => ppsspp-1.11.3_p20210627-r1.ebuild} | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
(In reply to Ionen Wolkens from comment #5) > (In reply to Maciej Barć from comment #4) > > (In reply to Ionen Wolkens from comment #3) > > > Looks like it needs [X] on libsdl2 too, didn't catch that one. > > > > Could you create a commit adding it? It would be much faster this way. > > Sure, if that's what you want. Thanks.
