see $subject
where did you find 11.0.12? latest tag is 11.0.11 here https://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/11-dev/rt/
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ff3f6a85bb049a349d47de3a6c0a5760f6494afc commit ff3f6a85bb049a349d47de3a6c0a5760f6494afc Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-18 04:22:38 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-18 04:39:07 +0000 dev-java/openjfx: add 11.0.11_p1 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/797604 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> dev-java/openjfx/Manifest | 1 + .../files/11/don-t-force-msse-11.0.11.patch | 92 +++++++++ .../files/11/respect-user-cflags-11.0.11.patch | 227 +++++++++++++++++++++ dev-java/openjfx/files/11/wno-error-11.0.11.patch | 43 ++++ dev-java/openjfx/openjfx-11.0.11_p1.ebuild | 225 ++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 588 insertions(+)
(In reply to Georgy Yakovlev from comment #1) > where did you find 11.0.12? > > latest tag is 11.0.11 here > https://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/11-dev/rt/ Seems to have moved: https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2021-July/006954.html
(In reply to Joakim Tjernlund from comment #3) > (In reply to Georgy Yakovlev from comment #1) > > where did you find 11.0.12? > > > > latest tag is 11.0.11 here > > https://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/11-dev/rt/ > > Seems to have moved: > https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2021-July/006954.html Appears to be an 11.0.13 now as well: https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2021-October/009368.html
Found a www page too: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/JDKUpdates/JDK11u
those are jdk links, we already have openjdk-11.0.13 bug is about openjfx so I'm confused right now =) we do need openjfx-17 port tho, that's on github, not in mercurial https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/branches but that's different.
(In reply to Georgy Yakovlev from comment #6) > those are jdk links, we already have openjdk-11.0.13 > > bug is about openjfx so I'm confused right now =) > > > > we do need openjfx-17 port tho, that's on github, not in mercurial > > https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/branches > but that's different. Right, silly me :) I did find an openjfx 11.0.12 at https://gluonhq.com/products/javafx/ Not sure what to make of that though.
I think they do backports and compile their packages https://gluonhq.com/products/javafx/openjfx-11-release-notes/ they have even newer here. issue list looks great and in theory it's possible to port those patches too, but I will not be doing it. After I find some time I'll just add openjfx version 17. it may work for both openjdk:11 and openjdk:17, as I've been told, but I have not tried it myself. I'll close this one, as bump to latest publicly available release happened.
