I have only devtmpfs in one of my systems (no udev, devfs). My expectation is that with devtmpfs, there is no need for any dev-manager, please correct me if I'm wrong? I noticed that it is still possible to install sys-fs/static-dev there that overwrites some files in /dev, despite the check: # We also want to not clobber newer devtmpfs setups. if [[ ${ROOT} == "/" ]] && \ ! awk '$2 == "/dev" && $3 == "devtmpfs" { exit 1 }' /proc/mounts ; then abort fi I wonder if instead of ${ROOT} == "/", we should be checking for ${ROOT} == "", as I think $ROOT expected to be empty? This code has been present since its initial commit: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/sys-fs/static-dev/static-dev-0.1.ebuild?id=56bd759df1d0c750a065b8c845e93d5dfa6b549d
You're right, that's a remnant from pre-EAPI 7! On it.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ca38032064b6bbcf36604e5c0421eac7533a0243 commit ca38032064b6bbcf36604e5c0421eac7533a0243 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-06-10 21:02:28 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-06-10 21:02:39 +0000 sys-fs/static-dev: fix ROOT check for EAPI 7 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/795285 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../static-dev/{static-dev-0.1-r1.ebuild => static-dev-0.1-r2.ebuild} | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
