Hello and thanks for this ebuild: I rely on it since a while. portpeek util, by mpagano has problems with kitty ebuild's keywords, and I think it is caused by the (unneeded) double quotes around "9999". Would you please remove them? like this : https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/gui-wm/sway/sway-1.6.ebuild Thanks for the support Arnaud
While it's true they're unneeded, it's still valid syntax and this should instead be fixed in portpeek if it's really the issue (haven't tried). At most quotes could be cleaned as part of other changes, but well.
> this should instead be fixed in portpeek agreed. I see you've attached the right persons, thanks.
(In reply to Arnaud Vallette d'Osia from comment #2) > > this should instead be fixed in portpeek > > agreed. > > I see you've attached the right persons, thanks. Can you explain to me which quotes you mean ? and what you have in your package.accept_keywords?
> Can you explain to me which quotes you mean ? Sure. those: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/x11-terms/kitty/kitty-0.20.3.ebuild#n10 > and what you have in your package.accept_keywords? yep, here: =x11-terms/kitty-0.20.3 ~amd64 =x11-terms/kitty-terminfo-0.20.3 ~amd64 Thanks for portpeek by the way: I sometimes painfully checked things manually before, and I'm glad to rely on your tool.
Arnaud, can you help me replicate? /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords: =x11-terms/kitty-0.20.3 ~amd64 =x11-terms/kitty-terminfo-0.20.3 ~amd64 installed: eix kitty [I] x11-terms/kitty Available versions: ~0.19.3 ~0.20.1 (~)0.20.3 **9999*l {debug wayland PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="(+)python3_8 python3_9"} Installed versions: 0.20.3(01:36:22 PM 06/07/2021)(-debug -wayland PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_9 -python3_8") Homepage: https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty Description: A modern, hackable, featureful, OpenGL-based terminal emulator [I] x11-terms/kitty-terminfo Available versions: ~0.19.3^t ~0.20.1^t (~)0.20.3^t **9999*l^t {debug} Installed versions: 0.20.3^t(01:36:01 PM 06/07/2021)(-debug) Homepage: https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty Description: Terminfo for kitty, an OpenGL-based terminal emulator portpeek -artq package.keywords: Could not find file /etc/portage/package.keywords No ebuild options found. package.accept_keywords: package.unmask: package.mask: package.use: package.env: Done
> Arnaud, can you help me replicate? Sure, thanks for the support, hope this helps: emerge -avp kitty These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ~] x11-terms/kitty-0.20.3::gentoo USE="wayland -debug" PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_9 -python3_8" 3 406 KiB Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 3 406 KiB portpeek -a package.keywords: Could not find file /etc/portage/package.keywords No ebuild options found. package.accept_keywords: Installed: <media-video/mpv-9999 Keywords ['amd64'] Installed: =app-misc/ddcutil-0.9.9 Keywords ['~amd64'] Installed: =x11-misc/piedock-1.6.9 Keywords ['~amd64'] Package: =x11-terms/kitty-0.20.3 ~amd64 not found. Please check /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords to validate entry Installed: =x11-terms/kitty-terminfo-0.20.3 Keywords ['~amd64'] Installed: =xfce-base/thunar-4.17.3 Keywords ['~amd64'] Installed: =gui-apps/waybar-0.9.7 Keywords ['~amd64'] Installed: =dev-libs/date-3.0.0 Keywords ['~amd64'] Installed: =gui-wm/wayfire-0.7.1 Keywords ['~amd64'] Installed: =gui-libs/wf-config-0.7.1 Keywords ['~amd64'] Installed: =gui-apps/wcm-0.7.0 Keywords ['~amd64'] package.unmask: package.mask: package.use: package.env:
Can you paste the output of emerge --info ? Which python version is active?
Created attachment 714645 [details] emerge --info python 3.9
Created attachment 714657 [details] Portage test python script Firstly, thanks for you patience. Can you run the attached script and print the output?
you're welcome, and thanks for the support ./test Package: =x11-term/kitty-0.20.3 exists
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=308e8a5cc6d7885e07ba16d9884ae63ca7366c2b commit 308e8a5cc6d7885e07ba16d9884ae63ca7366c2b Author: Mike Pagano <mpagano@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-06-11 18:57:44 +0000 Commit: Mike Pagano <mpagano@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-06-11 18:57:44 +0000 app-portage/portpeek: Fix split command Reported-by: Arnaud Vallette d'Osia Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/794439 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.18, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpagano@gentoo.org> app-portage/portpeek/Manifest | 1 + app-portage/portpeek/portpeek-3.2.1.ebuild | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
Yeah, that split() special behavior is a real foot-gun. Thanks for tracking this down. This indeed fixes this bug.
(In reply to Arnaud Vallette d'Osia from comment #12) > Yeah, that split() special behavior is a real foot-gun. > Thanks for tracking this down. > This indeed fixes this bug. Thanks for your quick responses. You made me look up foot-gun. :)
