has been in tree for a while and seems stable after regular usage for 2 months.
>The current stable series is 2.13.1. All releases are available in the release directory. I generally don't love rcs/alphas/* being in even ~arch without a mask. Is there any real advantage to doing this?
There have been a few fixes and information for new families has been added (like 'Regular' being the default weight in absence of any in the font file). In particular the new JoyPixels font inclusion in emoji family has been added. Better autohinting is another nice feature that has been improved.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7ad7b980f0cc6497bed201469ce0d5949260d558 commit 7ad7b980f0cc6497bed201469ce0d5949260d558 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-04-01 23:20:01 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-04-02 03:07:31 +0000 media-libs/fontconfig: add 2.14.0 - Clean up ebuild - Rebased patches (and submitted our docbook one upstream) - Add json-c test-only dependency - Scrub patches - Drop global scope usage from 2.13.93 while at it (fixes previous cleanup) - Rely on cache generation to create /var/cache/fontconfig Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/587492 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/710184 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785100 Fixes: 35ac56d0683de8ad8ab4316b109ef77a88a77300 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> media-libs/fontconfig/Manifest | 1 + .../files/fontconfig-2.10.2-docbook.patch | 6 +- .../files/fontconfig-2.13.1-proper_homedir.patch | 10 - .../files/fontconfig-2.13.1-static_build.patch | 10 - .../files/fontconfig-2.14.0-docbook.patch | 29 +++ .../files/fontconfig-2.14.0-latin-update.patch | 66 ++++++ .../fontconfig-2.14.0-skip-bubblewrap-tests.patch | 14 ++ media-libs/fontconfig/fontconfig-2.13.93.ebuild | 2 - media-libs/fontconfig/fontconfig-2.14.0.ebuild | 222 +++++++++++++++++++++ 9 files changed, 335 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)