Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 780618 - [guru] app-editors/bluegriffon-bin-3.1 does not respect CFLAGS/LDFLAGS
Summary: [guru] app-editors/bluegriffon-bin-3.1 does not respect CFLAGS/LDFLAGS
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: GURU
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Package issues (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: GURU project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: qa-guru
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2021-04-06 14:40 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2021-04-27 23:24 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,11.35 KB, text/plain)
2021-04-06 14:40 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-04-06 14:40:06 UTC
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: app-editors/bluegriffon-bin-3.1 does not respect CFLAGS/LDFLAGS.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: guru_tinderbox)

NOTE:
To reproduce this issue you may want to add "-frecord-gcc-switches" to CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/FFLAGS/FCFLAGS and LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0". If this is not something about c/c++ see this bug as an hint to hide the QA warning (with QA_FLAGS_IGNORED) where is not possible to respect CFLAGS/LDFLAGS.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-04-06 14:40:09 UTC
Created attachment 698001 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Reva Denis 2021-04-07 08:41:18 UTC
It's binary package.
Not a bug.
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-04-07 08:48:20 UTC
(In reply to Reva Denis from comment #2)
> It's binary package.
> Not a bug.

did you read entirely comment 0 ?
Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-04-25 14:01:53 UTC
Changing TRACKER as requested by QA.
Comment 5 Marco Scardovi (scardracs) 2021-04-27 11:43:19 UTC
(In reply to Reva Denis from comment #2)
> It's binary package.
> Not a bug.

Binary packages should have to use QA_PREBUILT to inform the QA process about this. If you don't add it, the QA process will take them as normal packages that need to be compiled and fails
Comment 6 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2021-04-27 23:24:07 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/proj/guru.git/commit/?id=05baf16b2b8430387e3822c3779a087dd242a5fd

commit 05baf16b2b8430387e3822c3779a087dd242a5fd
Author:     ScardracS <marco@scardovi.com>
AuthorDate: 2021-04-27 10:59:31 +0000
Commit:     Marco Scardovi <marco@scardovi.com>
CommitDate: 2021-04-27 11:38:57 +0000

    app-editors/bluegriffon-bin: various fixes
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/780618
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/780621
    
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.18, Repoman-3.0.3
    Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi <marco@scardovi.com>

 ...in-3.1.ebuild => bluegriffon-bin-3.1-r1.ebuild} | 64 +++++++++++++---------
 app-editors/bluegriffon-bin/metadata.xml           |  5 +-
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)