The big feature of qutebrowser 2.0.0 is its proper adblocker. For that, it uses the adblock library that is based on Braves adblocker. It seems, that the Gentoo qutebrowser version does not support it. Please add support for this feature. To quote from the changelog: > If the Python adblock library is available, it is now used to integrate Brave’s Rust adblocker library for improved adblocking based on ABP-like filter lists (such as EasyList). If it is unavailable, qutebrowser falls back to host-blocking, i.e. the same blocking technique it used before this release. (...) Add a new optional dependency on the Python adblock library (if packaged - if not, consider packaging it, albeit optional it’s very useful for users). Reproducible: Always
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=429d211b13cfd976895270e875e506d0194c719d commit 429d211b13cfd976895270e875e506d0194c719d Author: Stefan Strogin <steils@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-06-27 03:50:19 +0000 Commit: Stefan Strogin <steils@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-06-27 04:18:33 +0000 www-client/qutebrowser: add USE=adblock, other improvements - Add USE=adblock, enable it by default. - Mask adblock on x86 and arm64, as dev-python/adblock is not keyworded there yet. - Drop scripts flag from IUSE. There is no reason not to install userscripts. Let's always install them. - Install scripts from "scripts" directory (not just "userscripts"). Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/773643 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.20, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Stefan Strogin <steils@gentoo.org> profiles/arch/arm64/package.use.mask | 4 ++ profiles/arch/x86/package.use.mask | 4 ++ www-client/qutebrowser/metadata.xml | 2 + ...er-2.2.3.ebuild => qutebrowser-2.2.3-r1.ebuild} | 62 +++++++++++----------- 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)