Ready? Please remember to file stabilisation bugs ~30 days after a version lands in the tree if there are no bugs open and you believe it is ready (no regressions, etc). (Use packages.gentoo.org > Maintainers to see a list of your packages that may be ready for stabilisation). If it's ready, please add the 'CC-ARCHES' keyword.
Sorry, I forgot to submit stablereq. I've been using it for quite a long time and it's stable. I haven't received any new bugs. I have fixed the problem of makefile calling nm which in 10.3-r2 and submitted it to upstream, so 11.0 does not have this problem. Stabilization request for sci-electronics/iverilog-10.3 on amd64, x86, ppc and sparc.
(In reply to vowstar from comment #1) > Sorry, I forgot to submit stablereq. > I've been using it for quite a long time and it's stable. I haven't received > any new bugs. I have fixed the problem of makefile calling nm which in > 10.3-r2 and submitted it to upstream, so 11.0 does not have this problem. > > Stabilization request for sci-electronics/iverilog-10.3 on amd64, x86, ppc > and sparc. Sorry, Stabilization request for sci-electronics/iverilog-11.0 on amd64, x86, ppc and sparc.
x86 stable
amd64 done all arches done
(In reply to vowstar from comment #2) > (In reply to vowstar from comment #1) > > Sorry, I forgot to submit stablereq. > > I've been using it for quite a long time and it's stable. I haven't received > > any new bugs. I have fixed the problem of makefile calling nm which in > > 10.3-r2 and submitted it to upstream, so 11.0 does not have this problem. > > > > Stabilization request for sci-electronics/iverilog-10.3 on amd64, x86, ppc > > and sparc. > > Sorry, Stabilization request for sci-electronics/iverilog-11.0 on amd64, > x86, ppc and sparc. Any reason for ppc/sparc?
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > (In reply to vowstar from comment #2) > > (In reply to vowstar from comment #1) > > > Sorry, I forgot to submit stablereq. > > > I've been using it for quite a long time and it's stable. I haven't received > > > any new bugs. I have fixed the problem of makefile calling nm which in > > > 10.3-r2 and submitted it to upstream, so 11.0 does not have this problem. > > > > > > Stabilization request for sci-electronics/iverilog-10.3 on amd64, x86, ppc > > > and sparc. > > > > Sorry, Stabilization request for sci-electronics/iverilog-11.0 on amd64, > > x86, ppc and sparc. > > Any reason for ppc/sparc? Because in https://bugs.gentoo.org/713730, Andreas Sturmlechner considering to clean up the old version, ppc and sparc need to be stabilized.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4c02986d1eb865d18930db5d684b50f155d7cac2 commit 4c02986d1eb865d18930db5d684b50f155d7cac2 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-02-28 17:33:40 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-02-28 17:39:06 +0000 sci-electronics/iverilog: Revert "remove old" This dropped the last stable versions for ppc and sparc. This reverts commit df8b7414f4120d86af3b2d69a54529919ecef655. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/772065 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-electronics/iverilog/iverilog-10.3-r1.ebuild | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ sci-electronics/iverilog/iverilog-10.3.ebuild | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
ppc done
sparc done all arches done
Thanks!
