Hi, As per https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pinentry.git;a=blob;f=NEWS, the latest version of pinentry adds an EFL based pinentry. Could you please add a USE flag to allow this new frontend to be build ? Thanks, Bertrand Reproducible: Always
efl frontend is built if efl is found on the system; it would also nice to ave an option for pinentry-efl in eselect-pinentry (I currently use it on one of my systems without any issues)
(In reply to Michelangelo Scopelliti from comment #1) > efl frontend is built if efl is found on the system This is correct, however using undeclared dependencies is breaking reverse dependency model, slot bump etc (unsure about SONAME tracking as part of portage)
(In reply to Bertrand Jacquin from comment #2) > (In reply to Michelangelo Scopelliti from comment #1) > > efl frontend is built if efl is found on the system > > This is correct, however using undeclared dependencies is breaking reverse > dependency model, slot bump etc (unsure about SONAME tracking as part of > portage) Well, pinentry-1.1.1 has the configure switch --enable-pinentry-efl that should account for a conditional (if I understood what you mean)
(In reply to Michelangelo Scopelliti from comment #3) > (In reply to Bertrand Jacquin from comment #2) > > (In reply to Michelangelo Scopelliti from comment #1) > > > efl frontend is built if efl is found on the system > > > > This is correct, however using undeclared dependencies is breaking reverse > > dependency model, slot bump etc (unsure about SONAME tracking as part of > > portage) > > Well, pinentry-1.1.1 has the configure switch --enable-pinentry-efl that > should account for a conditional (if I understood what you mean) Yes, this is the proposal here, to add a USE flag to control the --{enable,disable}-pinentry-efl
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/19396 has been created on this purpose
*** Bug 771003 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=aa876f1a70835eceb5005a1175f48f448c5d959c commit aa876f1a70835eceb5005a1175f48f448c5d959c Author: Bertrand Jacquin <bertrand@jacquin.bzh> AuthorDate: 2021-02-09 23:14:56 +0000 Commit: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-02-23 15:33:09 +0000 app-eselect/eselect-pinentry: add pinentry-efl As per https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pinentry.git;a=blob;f=NEWS, pinentry 1.1.1 adds an EFL based pinentry. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/767181 Signed-off-by: Bertrand Jacquin <bertrand@jacquin.bzh> Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org> .../eselect-pinentry/eselect-pinentry-0.7.2.ebuild | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../eselect-pinentry/files/pinentry.eselect-0.7.2 | 12 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+) Additionally, it has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=0c904c5599cc8bbeb5ff15658137a748953ffcec commit 0c904c5599cc8bbeb5ff15658137a748953ffcec Author: Bertrand Jacquin <bertrand@jacquin.bzh> AuthorDate: 2021-02-09 23:09:38 +0000 Commit: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-02-23 15:33:09 +0000 app-crypt/pinentry: add pinentry-fltk As per https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pinentry.git;a=blob;f=NEWS, pinentry 1.1.1 adds an EFL based pinentry. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/767181 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/771003 Signed-off-by: Bertrand Jacquin <bertrand@jacquin.bzh> Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/19396 Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org> app-crypt/pinentry/metadata.xml | 3 + app-crypt/pinentry/pinentry-1.1.1-r1.ebuild | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
