Can we stabilize net-print/cnijfilter2-5.90 ? Needed for gcc-10
Not tested enough, it has only 4 days. I added it on the 02/01/21. But I have nothing against stabilizing. It works here
(In reply to Tupone Alfredo from comment #1) > Not tested enough, it has only 4 days. > I added it on the 02/01/21. > > But I have nothing against stabilizing. It works here Let's give it a round week then we can go ahead, if it's all working good there
amd64 done
x86 done all arches done
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c5b5bc290c14fee7b64caf6c71b11311e301d59b commit c5b5bc290c14fee7b64caf6c71b11311e301d59b Author: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr> AuthorDate: 2021-01-18 11:36:08 +0000 Commit: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-01-18 11:36:08 +0000 net-print/cnijfilter2: Remove old Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/764143 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr> Signed-off-by: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org> net-print/cnijfilter2/Manifest | 5 -- net-print/cnijfilter2/cnijfilter2-5.20.ebuild | 61 ----------------- net-print/cnijfilter2/cnijfilter2-5.40.ebuild | 64 ------------------ net-print/cnijfilter2/cnijfilter2-5.50.ebuild | 77 ---------------------- net-print/cnijfilter2/cnijfilter2-5.70.ebuild | 64 ------------------ net-print/cnijfilter2/cnijfilter2-5.80.ebuild | 77 ---------------------- .../files/cnijfilter2-5.20-gentoo.patch | 50 -------------- .../files/cnijfilter2-5.50-gentoo.patch | 8 --- 8 files changed, 406 deletions(-)