Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 759967 - dev-lang/luajit-2.1.1727870382-r1 does not respect LDFLAGS
Summary: dev-lang/luajit-2.1.1727870382-r1 does not respect LDFLAGS
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: PullRequest
Depends on:
Blocks: ldflags
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2020-12-14 09:18 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2024-11-21 09:24 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
build.log (build.log,31.23 KB, text/plain)
2020-12-14 09:18 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-12-14 09:18:09 UTC 
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: dev-lang/luajit-2.0.5-r3 does not respect LDFLAGS.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci)

NOTE:
To reproduce this issue you may want to set LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0". If this is not something about c/c++ context you may want to see this bug as an hint to hide the QA warning (with QA_FLAGS_IGNORED) where is not possible to respect LDFLAGS.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-12-14 09:18:12 UTC 
Created attachment 678271 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-02-15 07:10:00 UTC 
ci has reproduced this issue with version 2.1.0_beta3_p20220127 - Updating summary.
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-02-16 07:35:01 UTC 
ci has reproduced this issue with version 2.1.0_beta3_p20220127-r1 - Updating summary.
Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-06-21 06:49:06 UTC 
ci has reproduced this issue with version 2.1.0_beta3_p20220127-r2 - Updating summary.
Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-06-21 06:49:49 UTC 
ci has reproduced this issue with version 2.1.0_beta3_p20220613 - Updating summary.
Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2024-06-09 07:24:00 UTC 
ci has reproduced this issue with version 2.1.1716656478 - Updating summary.
Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2024-11-13 07:52:42 UTC 
ci has reproduced this issue with version 2.1.1727870382 - Updating summary.
Comment 8 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2024-11-14 07:54:47 UTC 
ci has reproduced this issue with version 2.1.1727870382-r1 - Updating summary.
Comment 9 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2024-11-21 09:24:37 UTC 
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f8c77dc7b846da5f726891305c72744e14c2768c

commit f8c77dc7b846da5f726891305c72744e14c2768c
Author:     Artemis Everfree <artemis@artemis.sh>
AuthorDate: 2024-11-21 03:17:35 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2024-11-21 09:24:14 +0000

    dev-lang/luajit: Set TARGET_SHLDFLAGS
    
    luajit uses TARGET_SHLDFLAGS to determine the LDFLAGS
    of the luajit library. We previously only set
    TARGET_LDFLAGS, which is used to link the executable
    interpreter. We now set TARGET_SHLDFLAGS appropriately.
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/759967
    Signed-off-by: Artemis Everfree <artemis@artemis.sh>
    Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/39393
    Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>

 .../{luajit-2.1.1716656478.ebuild => luajit-2.1.1716656478-r1.ebuild}    | 1 +
 dev-lang/luajit/luajit-2.1.1731601260.ebuild                             | 1 +
 dev-lang/luajit/luajit-2.1.9999999999.ebuild                             | 1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)