0.90 fixes some bugs and crashes seen in 0.87, in particular some qlop improvements. Please stabilise, thanks!
arm64 done
arm done
ppc64 stable
amd64 done
32-bits arches, please stabilise 0.90.1 instead. It is identical to 0.90, except it contains a configure change to detect a 32-bits arch and avoid a zstd problem.
x86 stable
Looking good on ppc. # cat portage-utils-753485.report USE tests started on Mi 18. Nov 02:37:12 CET 2020 FEATURES=' test' USE='' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl -nls -openmp -qmanifest -qtegrity -static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl -nls openmp -qmanifest -qtegrity -static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl nls -openmp qmanifest -qtegrity -static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl -nls openmp qmanifest -qtegrity -static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl nls -openmp -qmanifest qtegrity -static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl -nls openmp -qmanifest qtegrity -static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl -nls -openmp -qmanifest -qtegrity static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl -nls openmp -qmanifest -qtegrity static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl nls openmp -qmanifest -qtegrity static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl -nls -openmp -qmanifest qtegrity static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl nls -openmp -qmanifest qtegrity static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 USE='-libressl nls -openmp qmanifest qtegrity static' succeeded for =app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1 revdep tests started on Mi 18. Nov 03:02:10 CET 2020 FEATURES=' test' USE='' succeeded for sys-devel/crossdev FEATURES=' test' USE='' succeeded for app-admin/emacs-updater FEATURES=' test' USE='' succeeded for app-admin/perl-cleaner
hppa stable
ppc stable
sparc stable. Closing.
And now 0.90.1 has been cleaned from tree, but 0.90.0 has been kept. Was that intentional?
(In reply to Rolf Eike Beer from comment #12) > And now 0.90.1 has been cleaned from tree, but 0.90.0 has been kept. Was > that intentional? ah, no, since: (In reply to Fabian Groffen from comment #5) > 32-bits arches, please stabilise 0.90.1 instead. It is identical to 0.90, > except it contains a configure change to detect a 32-bits arch and avoid a > zstd problem.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3f983393493abffa821248b2dd0570860c6ce6b5 commit 3f983393493abffa821248b2dd0570860c6ce6b5 Author: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-07-08 06:47:13 +0000 Commit: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-07-08 06:47:30 +0000 app-portage/portage-utils-0.90.1: restore latest stable for 32-bits archs Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/753485 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.20, Repoman-3.0.2 RepoMan-Options: --force Signed-off-by: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> app-portage/portage-utils/Manifest | 1 + .../portage-utils/portage-utils-0.87.ebuild | 2 +- .../portage-utils/portage-utils-0.90.1.ebuild | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=244d413d6e80b97b23788fec482c73d1831d50f1 commit 244d413d6e80b97b23788fec482c73d1831d50f1 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-07-08 19:45:56 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-07-08 19:48:10 +0000 app-portage/portage-utils: restore keywords in 0.87 for ppc to unbreak CI Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/753485 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> app-portage/portage-utils/portage-utils-0.87.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Is there a particular reason that hppa and ppc are now back to 0.87? Both were stable on 0.90.1.
no, sorry, my mistake.
