A new version 2.12.0 seems to be available. Please update to latest release.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b00b41ce1d62df911bec838b336b1d3cff142ea6 commit b00b41ce1d62df911bec838b336b1d3cff142ea6 Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-16 20:49:29 +0000 Commit: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-16 20:49:29 +0000 app-misc/todo: version bump. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/738094 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.103, Repoman-2.3.23 Signed-off-by: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org> app-misc/todo/Manifest | 1 + app-misc/todo/todo-2.12.0.ebuild | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
Hmm, looks like this bump and the subsequent cleanup of the oldest version was incomplete compared to the related PR. The leftover old patch file has already been cleaned up separately, but it seems the command alias behavior is inconsistent with previous versions now. We still install the `todotxt` and `todocli` command aliases for `todo.sh`, but we dropped the related patch file, so there's complaints about missing completions during installation. Currently it's unclear for me if this is just an oversight, or if we actively would like to drop the aliases completely (or partially, e.g. just the bash completions for them). I've left a longer comment about this on the PR itself as well: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/17270#issuecomment-700585146 I think the changes from the PR can still be merged/cherry-picked, but I can also send a new PR with the desired changes. In the latter case, please advise how to proceed with the aliases (preserve, drop partially, drop completely, etc.).
Hi Ferenc Sorry for ignoring your PR, it was unintentional: I went through a massive list of version bumps and forgot to take into consideration potential PRs for a few packages. Apologies. Please file a new PR and I will take care of merging it properly this time around. Don't hesitate to nudge me on IRC or via email! ;) Thanks!
(In reply to Patrice Clement from comment #3) > Sorry for ignoring your PR, it was unintentional: I went through a massive > list of version bumps and forgot to take into consideration potential PRs > for a few packages. Apologies. No worries, mistakes happen, and we have these forums to discuss and resolve situations like this ;) > Please file a new PR and I will take care of merging it properly this time > around. Don't hesitate to nudge me on IRC or via email! ;) Alright, I'll rebase my version on top of current master branch, and will open a new PR.