Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 733128 - app-editors/jedit fails tests
Summary: app-editors/jedit fails tests
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: PullRequest
Depends on:
Blocks: 828599
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2020-07-18 08:52 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2021-12-29 08:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,10.24 KB, text/plain)
2020-07-18 08:52 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-07-18 08:52:29 UTC
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: app-editors/jedit fails tests.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: tinderbox)

NOTE:
This machine uses a clang/LLVM toolchain.
If you think that this issue is strictly related to clang/LLVM please block bug 408963. If you think that this issue isstrictly related to the LLD linker, please block bug 731004.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-07-18 08:52:35 UTC
Created attachment 649748 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Jakov Smolić archtester gentoo-dev 2021-12-24 18:20:13 UTC
Reproduced with 5.4.0-r1
Comment 3 Volkmar W. Pogatzki 2021-12-27 10:33:28 UTC
(In reply to Jakov Smolić from comment #2)
> Reproduced with 5.4.0-r1

Could we please proceed with stabilization? Or do these test failures necessarily need to block it?
According to devmanual[1] test failures should be "acceptable if [...] or failures are known and reported.

[1]https://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html#stabilization-rules
Comment 4 Jakov Smolić archtester gentoo-dev 2021-12-27 10:50:56 UTC
(In reply to Volkmar W. Pogatzki from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakov Smolić from comment #2)
> > Reproduced with 5.4.0-r1
> 
> Could we please proceed with stabilization? Or do these test failures
> necessarily need to block it?
> According to devmanual[1] test failures should be "acceptable if [...] or
> failures are known and reported.
> 
> [1]https://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html#stabilization-rules

If tests are known to be broken and do not impact the runtime functionality of the package ideally we'd restrict them in the ebuild and have a comment explaining the reasoning
Comment 5 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2021-12-29 08:45:58 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=8e46960c5f2d8130996ed3995ea788b4cc498ed4

commit 8e46960c5f2d8130996ed3995ea788b4cc498ed4
Author:     Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net>
AuthorDate: 2021-12-28 08:45:45 +0000
Commit:     Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2021-12-29 08:45:55 +0000

    app-editors/jedit: restrict test
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/733128
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.28, Repoman-3.0.3
    Signed-off-by: Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net>
    Signed-off-by: Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org>

 app-editors/jedit/jedit-5.4.0-r1.ebuild | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)