@@This is an auto-filed bug@@ If you think that a different summary clarifies the issue better, feel free to change it. Issue: sci-libs/lrslib does not respect LDFLAGS. Discovered on: amd64 NOTE: To reproduce this issue you may want to set LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0". If this is not something about c/c++ context you may want to see this bug as an hint to hide the QA warning (with QA_FLAGS_IGNORED) where is not possible to respect LDFLAGS.
Created attachment 644488 [details] build.log build log and emerge --info
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4bede998cb6d8b4654b50a706816796f08ee87e3 commit 4bede998cb6d8b4654b50a706816796f08ee87e3 Author: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-10-23 12:06:39 +0000 Commit: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-10-23 12:07:10 +0000 sci-libs/lrslib: new revision with CFLAGS/LDFLAGS patches. The LDFLAGS patch here is new, and fixes bug 728044. The CFLAGS patch merely replaces an inline "sed", but will allow me to send this change upstream (where they've made an effort to use CFLAGS before). Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/728044 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.20, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> .../lrslib/files/lrslib-071b-makefile-cflags.patch | 100 +++++++++++ .../files/lrslib-071b-makefile-ldflags.patch | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++ sci-libs/lrslib/lrslib-071b-r1.ebuild | 61 +++++++ 3 files changed, 345 insertions(+)