Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 725338 - app-emacs/emms-5.4: version bump
Summary: app-emacs/emms-5.4: version bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: GNU Emacs project
URL: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/in...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2020-05-25 14:15 UTC by Sam James
Modified: 2020-05-31 11:56 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2020-05-25 14:15:57 UTC 
See summary.
Comment 1 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev 2020-05-25 15:10:06 UTC 
Have you tested if an identical bump works?
Comment 2 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2020-05-31 10:44:34 UTC 
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=63331cb630933cf5f40ad365c5b70190ad7e9d00

commit 63331cb630933cf5f40ad365c5b70190ad7e9d00
Author:     Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2020-05-31 10:41:43 +0000
Commit:     Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2020-05-31 10:44:24 +0000

    app-emacs/emms: Version bump to 5.4.
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/725338
    Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.100, Repoman-2.3.22
    Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>

 app-emacs/emms/Manifest        |  1 +
 app-emacs/emms/emms-5.4.ebuild | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
Comment 3 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev 2020-05-31 10:45:20 UTC 
(In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #1)
> Have you tested if an identical bump works?

Indeed it does.

Thanks for reporting!
Comment 4 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2020-05-31 11:56:33 UTC 
(In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #3)
> (In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #1)
> > Have you tested if an identical bump works?
> 
> Indeed it does.
> 
> Thanks for reporting!

I wanted to get it tested first, sorry!