Was changed from Apache-2.0 to OFL-1.1 in 2015: https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/commit/af99ce359e4287cbe28085a95b2c9c827cacf13e#diff-9879d6db96fd29134fc802214163b95a
Does this apply to media-fonts/noto and media-fonts/noto-cjk as well?
(In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #1) > Does this apply to media-fonts/noto and media-fonts/noto-cjk as well? Now I'm not sure. Those two ebuilds are OFL-1.1 already, but as they build from source maybe they should all list *both* licenses?
(In reply to Anthony Parsons from comment #2) > Now I'm not sure. Those two ebuilds are OFL-1.1 already, but as they build > from source maybe they should all list *both* licenses? README.md says: ## License Emoji fonts (under the fonts subdirectory) are under the [SIL Open Font License, version 1.1](fonts/LICENSE).<br/> Tools and most image resources are under the [Apache license, version 2.0](./LICENSE). Flag images under third_party/region-flags are in the public domain or otherwise exempt from copyright ([more info](third_party/region-flags/LICENSE)). The ebuild installs fonts as well as icons from the png and svg subdirectories, so indeed it should have LICENSE="OFL-1.1 Apache-2.0". AFAICS, media-fonts/noto{,-cjk} are licensed under OFL-1.1 only, so nothing needs to be done there.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=658167a43fd18b3f1e8fbd9bdf45fdc2f1fe50a7 commit 658167a43fd18b3f1e8fbd9bdf45fdc2f1fe50a7 Author: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-04-01 23:29:23 +0000 Commit: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-04-01 23:29:23 +0000 media-fonts/noto-emoji: Fix license Thanks-to: Anthony Parsons Thanks-to: Ulrich Müller Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/715224 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.96, Repoman-2.3.22 Signed-off-by: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> media-fonts/noto-emoji/noto-emoji-20200311.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
