Since it's used for deprecated example, which is even untested and we'd like to mask gtkglext, I propose to drop this example from build together with dependency. Pullreq. Reproducible: Always
Just me being curious, who is 'we' in that context?
I'd expect all Gentoo devs, because maintaining hardly used GTK2 libs, which blocks new libs like latest pango [1] isn't much worth for anyone. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/698922
Well, that's what I ask when I see a tracker without dev involvement.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=cfece1167cece8d8aa2775cb149579804cca4a8f commit cfece1167cece8d8aa2775cb149579804cca4a8f Author: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-01-10 22:38:09 +0000 Commit: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-01-10 22:43:40 +0000 dev-games/openscenegraph: Drop USE gtk Reported-by: David Heidelberg (okias) <david@ixit.cz> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/703674 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.84, Repoman-2.3.20 Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> dev-games/openscenegraph/openscenegraph-3.5.5.ebuild | 7 +++---- dev-games/openscenegraph/openscenegraph-3.6.4.ebuild | 7 +++---- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
