It would be great to have the possibility to build the deprecated routines, perhaps adding a dedicated use flag (see lapack-reference-3.7.0). Thanks!
Thanks for reporting. We have dropped the deprecated USE flag from lapack 3.8. It is time to consider it.
Definitely time to allow deprecated routines: https://trac.openmodelica.org/OpenModelica/ticket/4886#comment:2
(In reply to vince.ice from comment #2) > Definitely time to allow deprecated routines: > https://trac.openmodelica.org/OpenModelica/ticket/4886#comment:2 Thanks for voicing up. Patches welcome.
(In reply to Benda Xu from comment #3) > (In reply to vince.ice from comment #2) > > Definitely time to allow deprecated routines: > > https://trac.openmodelica.org/OpenModelica/ticket/4886#comment:2 > > Thanks for voicing up. Patches welcome. here: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/14783/commits/3bf31866008aaf8ea18786bfcf44b18392e4dd5c
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=09e858da1b3331b1ed8786235a3e3bdb9732956d commit 09e858da1b3331b1ed8786235a3e3bdb9732956d Author: Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com> AuthorDate: 2020-02-29 10:49:33 +0000 Commit: Benda Xu <heroxbd@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-03-08 04:34:46 +0000 sci-libs/lapack: readd deprecated functions. Reported-By: leoricupero@gmail.com Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/702254 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/14803 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.89, Repoman-2.3.20 Signed-off-by: Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Benda Xu <heroxbd@gentoo.org> sci-libs/lapack/lapack-3.8.0-r1.ebuild | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ sci-libs/lapack/metadata.xml | 1 + 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
Reopening this because still to be solved with 3.9.0. Looking to the logs, on 8 March 2020, there was the commit for adding the deprecated useflag to 3.8.0 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/sci-libs/lapack?id=09e858da1b3331b1ed8786235a3e3bdb9732956d but later on 18 Sep 2020 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/sci-libs/lapack?id=1a9d2a5e0166770db4aefdd7f688e332a32f858a the version bump to 3.9.0 lost the new useflag :-(
3.9.0 doesn't have the headers for the deprecated routines. The headers are were readded upstream and now we have to wait for the next release or patch it
The patch to add should be this https://github.com/svillemot/lapack/commit/87536aa3c8bb0af00f66088fb6ac05d87509e011 As the lapack releases are not so frequent, can the patch be backported to 3.9.0 in the meantime?
I can prepare a PR if you are available to add to portage
here it is https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/19102
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=681412c77f8c1d58962f8159eb0cd0f648888d70 commit 681412c77f8c1d58962f8159eb0cd0f648888d70 Author: efferre79 <rossi.f@inwind.it> AuthorDate: 2021-01-18 10:48:46 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-02-06 21:29:06 +0000 sci-libs/lapack: add deprecated functions also to 3.9.0 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/702254 Signed-off-by: efferre79 <rossi.f@inwind.it> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../files/lapack-3.9.0-deprecated-headers.patch | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++ sci-libs/lapack/lapack-3.8.0-r1.ebuild | 4 +- sci-libs/lapack/lapack-3.8.0.ebuild | 4 +- sci-libs/lapack/lapack-3.9.0-r1.ebuild | 103 +++++++++++++++ sci-libs/lapack/lapack-3.9.0.ebuild | 2 +- 5 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Additionally, it has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=e299f36c470e4cdf7b2a97f8a9308da01aa80aa1 commit e299f36c470e4cdf7b2a97f8a9308da01aa80aa1 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-02-06 21:21:49 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-02-06 21:29:07 +0000 sci-libs/lapack: cleanup old, patch metadata Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/702254 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.14, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../files/lapack-3.9.0-deprecated-headers.patch | 3 + sci-libs/lapack/lapack-3.9.0.ebuild | 96 ---------------------- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=2279b9fe56f9ed156e11e6a65d6c4cfa803c78e0 commit 2279b9fe56f9ed156e11e6a65d6c4cfa803c78e0 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-02-06 21:31:38 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-02-06 21:31:42 +0000 sci-libs/lapack: minor style change ${P} (for me at least) implies the patch is upstreamed, which it is. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/702254 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.14, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-libs/lapack/lapack-3.9.0-r1.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
