Works on my machine. Tested with GPicView 0.2.5 and webp images.
I'd be happy make a PR to add the ~amd64 keyword I've been using it for years on amd64 machines myself. But technically it counts as a live ebuild (even though it's pinned to a specific commit) and repoman would be unhappy about adding a keyword there. Add to that the fact that it seems to be abandoned upstream (there are a couple of issues in the github repo including a request for a tarballed release to make packaging easier that are open for at least a year now) So I'm both unsure if it would be OK to keyword it from a gentoo packaging POV, as well as whether it would be a good idea even if it where OK.
0.0.1 version officially released.
(In reply to David Heidelberg (okias) from comment #2) > 0.0.1 version officially released. Maintainer, see this. But in theory taking a tar ball of the old snapshot would have been fine?
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=53776758a39cc7e3363b0854c45c77c7bb701fcc commit 53776758a39cc7e3363b0854c45c77c7bb701fcc Author: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-03-06 21:31:38 +0000 Commit: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-03-06 21:32:05 +0000 gui-libs/gdk-pixbuf-loader-webp: bump to 0.0.2 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/703864 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/693062 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.12, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> gui-libs/gdk-pixbuf-loader-webp/Manifest | 1 + .../gdk-pixbuf-loader-webp-0.0.2.ebuild | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
