Linux v14.4.2669 (Full) - Change Log We released a new version of the Linux full version Operating system: Linux Version: 14.4.2669 (Full) Release date: 2019-07-10 Change Log: Solved some other issues which caused crashes Minor improvements and fixes [ https://community.teamviewer.com/t5/Change-Log-Linux/Linux-v14-4-2669-Full-Change-Log/td-p/66886 ]
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4d8dce3ddb58d57b5ff967b7bed1256f17363280 commit 4d8dce3ddb58d57b5ff967b7bed1256f17363280 Author: Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2019-08-04 19:10:54 +0000 Commit: Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2019-08-04 19:12:31 +0000 net-misc/teamviewer: bump to 14.4.2669 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/689662 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.67, Repoman-2.3.12 Signed-off-by: Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@gentoo.org> net-misc/teamviewer/Manifest | 2 + net-misc/teamviewer/teamviewer-14.4.2669.ebuild | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ~] net-misc/teamviewer-14.4.2669 [14.2.8352] [blocks B ] sys-auth/consolekit ("sys-auth/consolekit" is blocking net-misc/teamviewer-14.4.2669) * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be * installed at the same time on the same system. (sys-auth/consolekit-1.2.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by sys-auth/consolekit[policykit] required by (sys-auth/polkit-0.115-r4:0/0::gentoo, installed) sys-auth/consolekit[pam] required by (sys-auth/pambase-20150213-r2:0/0::gentoo, installed) (net-misc/teamviewer-14.4.2669:14/14::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by net-misc/teamviewer required by @selected
Reason: /usr/portage/net-misc/teamviewer # grep consolekit *.ebuild teamviewer-14.4.2669.ebuild: !sys-auth/consolekit teamviewer-14.4.2669.ebuild:# For consolekit incompatibility see https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8332956.html?sid=3cc21e5a27935e38975ee85bf03317ae#8332956 sid /usr/portage/net-misc/teamviewer #
I believe this is the intended behavior.
(In reply to Michael from comment #4) > I believe this is the intended behavior. Yes, sure! @ Maxim: Thanks for documenting that hint as a comment into the ebuild. Proposal: What do you think of publishing this hint via "ewarn" ? Kind regards Manfred
It is quite clearly in elog.
(In reply to Michael from comment #6) > It is quite clearly in elog. Sorry - missed that: typo in my 'grep' :-( Sorry for the noise.
