Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 685208 - sys-cluster/glusterfs-6.1: version bump
Summary: sys-cluster/glusterfs-6.1: version bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal major (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Cluster Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: PullRequest
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-05-06 16:18 UTC by Jaco Kroon
Modified: 2019-05-08 16:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jaco Kroon 2019-05-06 16:18:10 UTC
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/6.1/ refers.

In particular this is biting us really, really bad:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692101

We've copied glusterfs-6.0.ebuild to glusterfs-6.1.ebuild.

We've proceeded to unpack and install on one of our bussiest nodes, and restarted glusterd with version 6.1, as well as mount.  So far (a few minutes) everything seems to be at least as good as 6.0 with the exception that the network IO is looking a LOT better (and currently handling the 3x the normal load).

Would appreciate an update to glusterfs-6.1 please.
Comment 1 Jaco Kroon 2019-05-07 11:13:03 UTC
Just to confirm, we've been running stably on two servers now since reporting this.

We've also dropped from maxing out at 1Gbit on our links down to peak at sub 50Mbps.

https://dexter.iewc.co.za/serverstats/Network%20IO/bond0/
https://deedee.iewc.co.za/serverstats/Network%20IO/bond0/

For reference.  You can see the absolutely chaos since update to 6.0 and pre update to 6.1.

Average ~500mbit (which Gluster is functional) to sub 20Mbit, which is a somewhat bigger improvement than reported on the referenced upstream bug.

Other issues we've seen (disappearing files) seems to also be resolved (but that I'd rather wait for about a week before saying it's definitely sorted).  And the parallel read performance is a big bonus.

May I thus request that we please get this one done as soon as possible?
Comment 2 Tomáš Mózes 2019-05-08 03:06:27 UTC
Thanks for the feedback and testing, PR at https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/11934.
Comment 3 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2019-05-08 16:55:30 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f271c426c9a09b4d4be720698e0635eee8aada08

commit f271c426c9a09b4d4be720698e0635eee8aada08
Author:     Tomas Mozes <tmozes@sygic.com>
AuthorDate: 2019-05-08 03:03:09 +0000
Commit:     Alexys Jacob <ultrabug@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2019-05-08 16:55:19 +0000

    sys-cluster/glusterfs: bump to 6.1
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/685208
    Signed-off-by: Tomáš Mózes <hydrapolic@gmail.com>
    Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/11934
    Signed-off-by: Alexys Jacob <ultrabug@gentoo.org>

 sys-cluster/glusterfs/Manifest             |   1 +
 sys-cluster/glusterfs/glusterfs-6.1.ebuild | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 208 insertions(+)
Comment 4 Ultrabug gentoo-dev 2019-05-08 16:55:57 UTC
Thanks guys