Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 68414 - x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 Missing lucida* iso-8859-* font variants
Summary: x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 Missing lucida* iso-8859-* font variants
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo X packagers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Inclusion
: 69520 72264 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-21 08:58 UTC by PL Hayes
Modified: 2004-11-23 10:41 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description PL Hayes 2004-10-21 08:58:15 UTC
Okay - sorry about putting this in bug #64248 earlier:

Having just emerged xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1, the b&h lucida* iso-8859-* fonts are *missing* from the 75/100 dpi bitmap fonts, the fonts.alias files in those directories are consequently wrong and apps like emacs, which don't seem to like the remaining iso-10646 lucida fonts anyway, don't work properly.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 2 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-10-21 09:09:53 UTC
http://freedesktop.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xorg/xc/fonts/bdf/75dpi/Imakefile?r1=1.3&r2=1.4

I'll stick these patches in soon.
Comment 3 tomcat 2004-10-25 15:11:10 UTC
posted a temporary workout here:

http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=1690841#1690841

scroll to the howto post ;-)

Hope this will help someone!
Comment 4 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-10-31 00:48:34 UTC
*** Bug 69520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-11-03 00:37:16 UTC
Fixed in 6.8.0-r2 in CVS. Please test.
Comment 6 PL Hayes 2004-11-17 15:28:18 UTC
Well I'm happy to test ~x86 stuff but when something critical like X is hard masked, I'm rather reluctant to, so I was unable to test or take advantage of the patched r2 but now I've just emerged r3 and I still don't have the fonts.
Comment 7 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-11-17 15:41:10 UTC
-r3 is simply a security patch added onto -r1. -r4 is the continuation of -r2 and has the fix.
Comment 8 PL Hayes 2004-11-18 05:44:17 UTC
"-r4 is the continuation of -r2 and has the fix."

...and -r4 is also masked - so again, I cannot use it and I don't think a bug should be marked as fixed when there is not even a ~x86 ebuild available for us poor ordinary users.

Anyway, tomcat's workaround doesn't even work now - the file at the URL he gave has moved or something but luckily I have found the fonts on an unused partition and will be copying them across. I'll be happy to email them to anyone else who needs them.

Comment 9 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-11-18 08:50:58 UTC
In our current method of handling X bugs, we don't specify whether a bug is already fixed but not keyworded a certain way. That creates more work by requiring us to constantly check whether any of a long list of bugs is fixed with a certain ebuild.

So when something is fixed, it's fixed. Anything else requires more effort, which I don't currently have the time for. That's why I'm looking for recruits.

The ebuild will be unmasked in due time. I posted to gentoo-dev yesterday asking for testers.
Comment 10 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-11-23 10:41:49 UTC
*** Bug 72264 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***