# Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org> (27 Jun 2014) # Masked for proper testing. (Major updates in the code). ~dev-perl/PortageXS-0.2.12 I dare say this package is not really maintained if the bump has not been umasked for 4 years. Do we want to keep it or is it time to wipe it?
Its a case where I'm also upstream now, and there's changes I need to fix, but I just haven't had the time, due to all the rest of $life and the constant fire I'm putting out in perl.
Ping.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b5678f9452dff2c54da4a50cad1ff81ce097fddf commit b5678f9452dff2c54da4a50cad1ff81ce097fddf Author: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr> AuthorDate: 2021-06-06 17:21:57 +0000 Commit: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-06-06 17:21:57 +0000 dev-perl/PortageXS: Remove last-rited pkg Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/21103 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/264680 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/289524 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/332611 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/473394 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/613114 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/625536 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/671244 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/688238 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr> Signed-off-by: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org> dev-perl/PortageXS/Manifest | 2 - dev-perl/PortageXS/PortageXS-0.02.10-r4.ebuild | 54 ------ dev-perl/PortageXS/PortageXS-0.2.10-r5.ebuild | 60 ------- dev-perl/PortageXS/PortageXS-0.2.12-r1.ebuild | 63 ------- .../files/0.02.12/PortageXS-0.02.12-prefix.patch | 198 --------------------- .../files/PortageXS-0.02.10-portage_path_fix.patch | 86 --------- .../PortageXS/files/PortageXS-0.02.10-prefix.patch | 137 -------------- dev-perl/PortageXS/metadata.xml | 17 -- profiles/package.mask | 11 -- 9 files changed, 628 deletions(-)