I just read the upstream ticket https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/3703 It looks to me that a non free lib [1] was compiled in the binary and the binary was distributed as free software. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/jsonevil
Does that mean that we should add this license to portage and then ask the user to agree to it?
(In reply to Nicolas Bock from comment #1) > Does that mean that we should add this license to portage and then ask the > user to agree to it? yes
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=5ba0a57804151400576e8dfd2b4052f3aec7b59c commit 5ba0a57804151400576e8dfd2b4052f3aec7b59c Author: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-10-01 16:49:33 +0000 Commit: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-10-01 17:04:07 +0000 app-text/jabref-bin: update LICENSE Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/666712 Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org> app-text/jabref-bin/jabref-bin-3.8.2.ebuild | 4 ++-- app-text/jabref-bin/jabref-bin-4.3.1.ebuild | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I was unable to check the license of the live package (4.9999) because it cannot be fetched/unpacked. See bug 915043.