bcache-tools are the userspace tools required for bcache, not bcachefs.
I can confirm that this description is incorrect. Bcache and bcachefs are rather different things, though from the same original author. For one thing, bcachefs is a filesystem, and bcache is not. Bcache creates and manages a block device. As such, putting bcache-tools in sys-fs is dubious; it would seem to fit better in sys-apps. But I suppose it's no more surprising than LVM2 being in sys-fs... In any case, removing those two characters "fs" from the description could save someone a lot of confusion.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c1d32d59c7cb7d8ef7351e1c64575ac780e8d1b7 commit c1d32d59c7cb7d8ef7351e1c64575ac780e8d1b7 Author: Alec Moskvin <alecm@gmx.com> AuthorDate: 2020-09-12 16:26:11 +0000 Commit: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-25 22:28:23 +0000 sys-fs/bcache-tools: version bump to 1.1 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/722002 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/656884 Signed-off-by: Alec Moskvin <alecm@gmx.com> Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/17510 Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> sys-fs/bcache-tools/Manifest | 1 + sys-fs/bcache-tools/bcache-tools-1.1.ebuild | 70 ++++ .../files/1.1/bcache-tools-add-bcache-status.patch | 381 +++++++++++++++++++++ ...bcache-tools-add-man-page-bcache-status.8.patch | 69 ++++ 4 files changed, 521 insertions(+)
