640656 – [TRACKER] portage: merge prefix branch to master

Bug 640656 - [TRACKER] portage: merge prefix branch to master

Summary: [TRACKER] portage: merge prefix branch to master

Status:	CONFIRMED

Alias:	None

Product:	Portage Development
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Trackers (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal enhancement
Assignee:	Portage team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	Tracker

Depends on:	596030 640658
Blocks:	prefix-gx86
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2017-12-11 08:48 UTC by Benda Xu
Modified:	2024-06-10 02:22 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Benda Xu gentoo-dev

2017-12-11 08:48:30 UTC

After years of work, the prefix and master branches are quite similar.  It's time to initiate a final merge of the long separated couple.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt 2020-08-13 12:39:13 UTC

It's probably about time to revisit this .. what's left folks?

Comment 2 Fabian Groffen gentoo-dev

2021-01-06 11:54:51 UTC

A lot ...

But most of it is tagged with "PREFIX LOCAL", making it easier to see the differences.

I wonder if it isn't going to be easier to introduce sys-apps/portage-prefix, as I'm not sure if we can easily bridge all necessary differences.  It needs a review of diffs between the branches in any case.

Comment 3 Benda Xu gentoo-dev

2023-06-25 09:36:59 UTC

(In reply to Fabian Groffen from comment #2)
> A lot ...
> 
> But most of it is tagged with "PREFIX LOCAL", making it easier to see the
> differences.
> 
> I wonder if it isn't going to be easier to introduce
> sys-apps/portage-prefix, as I'm not sure if we can easily bridge all
> necessary differences.  It needs a review of diffs between the branches in
> any case.

I reviewed all the PREFIX LOCAL.  It looks like many of them could now be safely land on master.