Please, ASSIGN to Tobias Klausmann. =================================== Please, c.f. Bug 635786 - net-ftp/atftp-0.7-r5 : neither HOMEPAGE nor original SRC_URI available any more https://bugs.gentoo.org/635786#c2
btw: 0.7.1 alongside with blksize patch from https://bugs.gentoo.org/513486 is available more that 5 years from barzog-overlay
PING @ Assignee: Tobias Klausmann: . . . R u alive ?
Hi, I am SF-user md11 and took over maintenance of atftp on SF several years ago. You are right, it's time for integrating the misc. patches that arrived in the last months/years into the sourceforge repo. I think this will be worth a 0.7.2 release. And I can proxy-maint this package in the future if desired.
I am, (In reply to Martin Dummer from comment #3) > You are right, it's time for integrating the misc. patches that arrived in > the last months/years into the sourceforge repo. I think this will be worth > a 0.7.2 release. That would be delightful. > And I can proxy-maint this package in the future if desired. That would also be great. My use case for atftp is long gone, and I mentioned that the package is maintainer-wanted, but nobody stepped up so far.
I have addressed the immediate concerns of SRC_URI and HOMEPAGE in bug 635786. As for this particular version bump: Martin, what do you think the time frame for 0.7.2 will be? Trying to avoid making a bump and then another within 12h of each other.
It is like going to the dentist... nobody wants that, but one day you realize it is necessary. I will collect patches and do tests on atftp the next days, so it will take at least 1-2 weeks. If you are over-motivated and have working capacity left, you may look my PRs on github - they're open since weeks https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pulls?q=author%3Amadmartin+is%3Aopen
New bugfix release is out https://sourceforge.net/projects/atftp/files/ Do you want a PR on Github?
That wuld (In reply to Martin Dummer from comment #7) > New bugfix release is out > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/atftp/files/ > > Do you want a PR on Github? That would be easiest, thanks!
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=a381735043aa3af0fb344388d12148b857d57847 commit a381735043aa3af0fb344388d12148b857d57847 Author: Martin Dummer <martin.dummer@gmx.net> AuthorDate: 2019-04-22 10:11:17 +0000 Commit: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2019-04-23 08:09:09 +0000 net-ftp/atftp: version bump to 0.7.2 new version 0.7.2, includes all patches from debian & gentoo add proxy-maintainer Signed-off-by: Martin Dummer <martin.dummer@gmx.net> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/513486 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/636150 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.63, Repoman-2.3.12 Signed-off-by: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@gentoo.org> net-ftp/atftp/Manifest | 1 + net-ftp/atftp/atftp-0.7.2.ebuild | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net-ftp/atftp/files/atftp-0.7.2-CFLAGS.patch | 32 +++++++++++++ net-ftp/atftp/files/atftp.init | 0 net-ftp/atftp/metadata.xml | 13 ++++-- 5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
