Can media-libs/libprojectm-2.1.0-r2 be stabilized? If yes, please cc arches. If no, we need to backport gcc-6 compatibility.
(In reply to Andreas K. Hüttel from comment #0) > Can media-libs/libprojectm-2.1.0-r2 be stabilized? > > If yes, please cc arches. > If no, we need to backport gcc-6 compatibility. No response for > 2 weeks, no regressions in bugzilla, going ahead. Arches please stabilize.
ppc64 stable
ppc stable
Stable on amd64
Stable on alpha.
x86 stable
ping
commit 379e93421ef220ad68d4494f76eb193f248c4088 Author: Rolf Eike Beer <eike@sf-mail.de> Date: Sat Mar 17 10:26:55 2018 +0100 media-libs/libprojectm: stable 2.1.0-r2 for sparc, bug #632094 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6 RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=083b67094868896f5faa1e569cfe4731c6b0b1d5 commit 083b67094868896f5faa1e569cfe4731c6b0b1d5 Author: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2018-04-18 06:31:43 +0000 Commit: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2018-04-18 06:31:43 +0000 media-libs/libprojectm: stable 2.1.0-r2 for hppa, bug #632094 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/632094 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.28, Repoman-2.3.9 RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="hppa" media-libs/libprojectm/libprojectm-2.1.0-r2.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)}
Last arch. Closing.