Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 623004 - <dev-perl/Net-IMAP-Simple-1.220.900 fails tests without '.' in @INC (do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm")
Summary: <dev-perl/Net-IMAP-Simple-1.220.900 fails tests without '.' in @INC (do "t/te...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Perl team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: TESTFAILURE
Depends on:
Blocks: perl-5.26-no-dot-inc
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2017-06-29 07:02 UTC by Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED)
Modified: 2017-12-17 01:25 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-06-29 07:02:04 UTC
>>> Test phase: dev-perl/Net-IMAP-Simple-1.220.600
 * Test::Harness Jobs=3
make -j3 test TEST_VERBOSE=0
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness" "-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/01_load.t .......................... ok                               
t/10_list.t .......................... ok                               
t/07_select_and_examine.t ............ Failed 16/16 subtests            
===(       2;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/11_mailboxes.t line 21.
t/11_mailboxes.t ..................... Failed 2/2 subtests
===(       2;0  0/3  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/08_selectalot.t line 23.
t/08_selectalot.t .................... Failed 3/3 subtests
===(       2;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/15_flags.t line 81.
t/15_flags.t ......................... Failed 46/46 subtests
===(       2;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/19_readline_callback.t line 34.
t/19_readline_callback.t ............. Failed 2/2 subtests
===(       2;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/16_exotic_flags.t line 24.
t/16_exotic_flags.t .................. Failed 3/3 subtests
===(       2;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/17_status_and_select.t line 36.
t/17_status_and_select.t ............. Failed 6/6 subtests
===(       2;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/22_uidcopy_multiple.t line 30.
t/22_uidcopy_multiple.t .............. Failed 5/5 subtests
===(       2;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/22_copy_multiple.t line 28.
t/22_copy_multiple.t ................. Failed 5/5 subtests
===(       2;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/23_delete_multiple.t line 26.
t/23_delete_multiple.t ............... Failed 4/4 subtests
===(       2;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/35_imap_results_in_message_body.t line 40.
t/35_imap_results_in_message_body.t .. Failed 1/1 subtests
t/42_preauth_with_command.t .......... ok                               
===(       3;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/45_search.t line 31.
t/45_search.t ........................ Failed 8/8 subtests
===(       3;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/55_uid_stuff.t line 36.
t/55_uid_stuff.t ..................... Failed 7/7 subtests
t/70_list2range.t .................... ok                               
===(       4;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/50_body_summary.t line 65.
t/50_body_summary.t .................. Failed 11/11 subtests
t/80_top.t ........................... ok                               
t/critic.t ........................... ok                               
t/pod.t .............................. ok                               
t/pod_coverage.t ..................... ok                               
===(       8;0  0/?  0/? )==============================================do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/75_back_and_forth.t line 40.
t/75_back_and_forth.t ................ Failed 13/13 subtests
t/60_fetch_with_grammar.t ............ do "t/test_runner.pm" failed, '.' is no longer in @INC; did you mean do "./t/test_runner.pm"? at t/60_fetch_with_grammar.t line 64.
t/60_fetch_with_grammar.t ............ Failed 8/8 subtests
Comment 1 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2017-12-04 01:05:33 UTC
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b10843e44192266e864008ffab958733dc62152e

commit b10843e44192266e864008ffab958733dc62152e
Author:     Kent Fredric <kentnl@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2017-12-04 01:04:34 +0000
Commit:     Kent Fredric <kentnl@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2017-12-04 01:05:15 +0000

    dev-perl/Net-IMAP-Simple: Bump to version 1.220.900 re bug #623004
    
    - EAPI6
    - Add USE=examples
    - Kill bad authortests
    - Document testing plans
    
    Upstream:
    - Fix unit tests against Gmail and Dovecot
    - Add support for data items in ->get
    - SimpleX no longer optional
    - Add put_with_date()
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/623004
    Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.14, Repoman-2.3.6

 dev-perl/Net-IMAP-Simple/Manifest                  |  3 +-
 .../Net-IMAP-Simple-1.220.900.ebuild               | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)}
Comment 2 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2017-12-16 11:27:55 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=a94e52e639db34de23bf49ea78342019e20bf4e4

commit a94e52e639db34de23bf49ea78342019e20bf4e4
Author:     Kent Fredric <kentnl@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2017-12-16 11:11:56 +0000
Commit:     Kent Fredric <kentnl@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2017-12-16 11:22:44 +0000

    dev-perl/Net-IMAP-Simple: Cleanup old re bug #623004
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/623004
    Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.18, Repoman-2.3.6

 dev-perl/Net-IMAP-Simple/Manifest                  |  1 -
 .../Net-IMAP-Simple-1.220.600.ebuild               | 23 ----------------------
 2 files changed, 24 deletions(-)