sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.6.3 will be needed for GCC 6. Reproducible: Always
Okay to Cc arches?
Arches, please test & stabilize sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.7.0. Package includes unit tests Target keywords: alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, ppc, ppc64, x86, arm64
ia64 stable
Stable on alpha.
Stable on amd64
x86 stable
Stabilization for x86 reverted due to bug 631364.
ppc =thin-provisioning-tools-0.7.0 builds but 3 tests fail: [----------] Global test environment tear-down [==========] 189 tests from 25 test cases ran. (286378 ms total) [ PASSED ] 186 tests. [ FAILED ] 3 tests, listed below: [ FAILED ] BTreeCounterTests.count_empty_tree [ FAILED ] BTreeCounterTests.count_populated_tree [ FAILED ] CacheSuperblockTests.version_gt_1_is_checked
ppc/ppc64 stable
ping
sparc stable (thanks to Rolf Eike Beer)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=eb04ef8979ba2dae80759f4fd4f6248037958dfb commit eb04ef8979ba2dae80759f4fd4f6248037958dfb Author: Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2017-12-09 09:59:02 +0000 Commit: Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2017-12-09 09:59:15 +0000 sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools: stabilise 0.7.0 for x86 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/619126 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.14, Repoman-2.3.6 sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools/thin-provisioning-tools-0.7.0.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)}
Proceeded with x86 stable despite test regression because I think it's just broken tests, and previous stable fails to build at all now.
Should 0.7.5 be called for stabilization now? It has been in tree since November and it at least fixes the failing tests that we ignored here.
hppa stable (thanks to Rolf Eike Beer)
arm stable
