tracker-1.6.0 needs libosinfo which needs libsoup-gnome. libsoup-gnome-2.50.0 requires libsoup.2.50.0 but dev-libs/appstream-glib 0.5.3 requires libsoup-2.52.2 I think we need libsoup-gnome-2.52.2 I tried copying libsoup-gnome-2.5.0.ebuild to libsoup-gnome-2.52.2.ebuild but it fails to build.
note: arch libsoup-2.52 includes libsoup-gnome. That does not seem to be the case in our libsoup-2.52 but if it is then the dependencies of rest and libosinfo need to be adjusted.
It looks like both arch and fedora have replaced libsoup-gnome with libsoup-2.52.2 as a workaround I did the following: deleted the --without-gnome line from the libsoup-2.52.2 ebuild It built fine and provide libsoup-gnome libraries I then modified the rest and libosinfo ebuild to depend on libsoup-2.52.2:24 instead of libsoup-gnome. They both built fine without libsoup-gnome. Use this info as you see fit. We either have to go this route with adjustments for earlier gnome versions or we need a newer version of libsoup-gnome that builds with libsoup-2.52.2 and other gnome-3.18 components
Yeah, it's incomplete because libsoup-gnome needs to get the big patch updated :S
(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #3) > Yeah, it's incomplete because libsoup-gnome needs to get the big patch > updated :S Do we actually really need to split this anymore? IIRC it was originally split to accommodate the libproxy requirement but its requirement in libsoup-gnome was reworked awhile ago (in version 2.34 which also dropped gconf requirement) to use gio. It was already back then when I wanted to drop libsoup-gnome (in gnome-overlay) and have a single package. As it stands now, `--with-gnome` requires no extra libraries and it doesn't enable any conditional code paths, except of the extra library with bunch of new symbols.
I had this discussion before (I think at Gnome 3.8 time), but other people in the team strongly disagreed on dropping this splitting... Well, at least now it seems that far less packages need the obsolete libsoup-gnome
(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #5) > I had this discussion before (I think at Gnome 3.8 time), but other people > in the team strongly disagreed on dropping this splitting... > > Well, at least now it seems that far less packages need the obsolete > libsoup-gnome How about we just install libsoup-gnome with net-libs/libsoup and have empty net-libs/libsoup-gnome that provides no files?
Created attachment 417188 [details, diff] libsoup.patch This could be the updated patch... but I cannot test it as I am not with my machine ;)
make -j5 make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/libsoup-gnome-2.52.2/work/libsoup-2.52.2-abi_x86_64.amd64' Making all in libsoup make[2]: Entering directory '/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/libsoup-gnome-2.52.2/work/libsoup-2.52.2-abi_x86_64.amd64/libsoup' Makefile:1403: *** missing separator. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/libsoup-gnome-2.52.2/work/libsoup-2.52.2-abi_x86_64.amd64/libsoup' Makefile:557: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/libsoup-gnome-2.52.2/work/libsoup-2.52.2-abi_x86_64.amd64' Makefile:462: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 It fails
It looks error is referring to this part, any ideas? +endif + +if BUILD_LIBSOUP_GNOME +if OS_LINUX +check-local: + @echo Checking libsoup-gnome-2.4.so symbols + @nm $(builddir)/.libs/libsoup-gnome-2.4.so | \ + grep "^[[:xdigit:]]\+ [BTR] " | \ + sed "s/^[[:xdigit:]]\+ [BTR] //" | \ + env LANG=C sort -u | \ + diff -U0 $(srcdir)/libsoup-gnome-2.4.sym - >&2 +endif +endif
Created attachment 417340 [details, diff] libsoup.patch After fixing some spaces vs. tabs it looks to work
I really think we should unsplit this. Such patches are really unmaintainable long-term and cause unnecessary confusion. Diverging from upstream is not the Gentoo Way. That said, keeping libsoup-gnome as meta-ebuild seems fine to me. This is what we did to clang to keep things working until upstream fixes out-of-llvm build.
Created attachment 417346 [details] libsoup-gnome-2.52.2.ebuild And this is the ebuild that finally works (but I cannot commit as I am far from my dev machine :S)
Well.. maybe for this cycle we can finally keep the splitting (as the work is already done). For the next breakage... I was checking for reverse deps and the only reverse dep that went in the opposite way (it *started* to depend on obsolete libsoup-gnome instead of moving away from it) is midori :S I reported a bug to upstream a few days ago but I don't have enough knowledge to provide them a patch :( The other reverse deps are being moved away of it
Well, I presume you didn't want to add it with stable keywords, so I lowered them. commit 96f051197156152dc283c014747c56b693f52eb9 Author: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> Date: Thu Nov 19 15:17:55 2015 +0100 net-libs/libsoup-gnome: Bump to 2.52.2 Commit the 2.52.2 version bump on behalf of Pacho Ramos. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/565796
Sure, thanks a lot!
