considering http2 is the fuuuuuture, we should have it enabled by default
I'd like to have this settled a bit. My current plan is to default-enable it with apache-2.4.20 at the latest.
settle in what way ? nghttp2 is in stable now. i've been using http2 on my site now for months ... first via mod_spdy, then mod_h2, and now via the apache mod.
hello! I would like to contribute to Gentoo, so I can pay back to the nice distribution and get some experience along the way. Hehe, apache 2.4.20 is released some time ago and currently it is 2.4.29. So I tried to make the apache_modules_http2 enabled by default. I couldn't think of anything better than just defining: IUSE="+apache2_modules_http2" Is this acceptable or there must be some more elegant way to handle it? The PR I am about to create bumps the ebuild revision and introduces this change.
(In reply to Oleksandr Trotsenko from comment #3) > hello! > > I would like to contribute to Gentoo, so I can pay back to the nice > distribution and get some experience along the way. Great :) > Hehe, apache 2.4.20 is released some time ago and currently it is 2.4.29. So > I tried to make the apache_modules_http2 enabled by default. Yeah, I completely lost track of this bug. Sorry. > I couldn't think of anything better than just defining: > IUSE="+apache2_modules_http2" Does repoman (from app-portage/repoman package) complain about that change? > Is this acceptable or there must be some more elegant way to handle it? Dunno to be honest. Need to look into that myself. > The PR I am about to create bumps the ebuild revision and introduces this > change. Yeah, that's preferred procedure.
Thanks for the prompt reply :) Repoman told me: bucefal91@dell ~/gentoo/repo/www-servers/apache $ repoman -dx full RepoMan scours the neighborhood... dependency.badindev 8 www-servers/apache/apache-2.4.27-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/11.1) ['>=net-libs/nghttp2-1.2.1'] www-servers/apache/apache-2.4.28.ebuild: DEPEND: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/11.1) ['>=net-libs/nghttp2-1.2.1'] www-servers/apache/apache-2.4.29.ebuild: DEPEND: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/11.1) ['>=net-libs/nghttp2-1.2.1'] www-servers/apache/apache-2.4.29.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/11.1) ['>=net-libs/nghttp2-1.2.1'] www-servers/apache/apache-2.4.29-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/11.1) ['>=app-arch/brotli-0.6.0:=', '>=net-libs/nghttp2-1.2.1'] www-servers/apache/apache-2.4.29-r1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/11.1) ['>=app-arch/brotli-0.6.0:=', '>=net-libs/nghttp2-1.2.1'] www-servers/apache/apache-2.4.29-r2.ebuild: DEPEND: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/11.1) ['>=app-arch/brotli-0.6.0:=', '>=net-libs/nghttp2-1.2.1'] www-servers/apache/apache-2.4.29-r2.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/11.1) ['>=app-arch/brotli-0.6.0:=', '>=net-libs/nghttp2-1.2.1'] RepoMan sez: "You're only giving me a partial QA payment? I'll take it this time, but I'm not happy." But I figured these warnings have already existed. And they are applicable only to dev profiles, i.e. when repoman is run with the --include-dev (-d) option.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=8aed55978b5cd3375bc32f32792e3512862a3b94 commit 8aed55978b5cd3375bc32f32792e3512862a3b94 Author: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2018-03-15 10:59:02 +0000 Commit: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2018-03-15 11:00:19 +0000 www-servers/apache: Bump to version 2.4.32 Changes/Enhancements: - Enabled http2 by default (#563452) - Pass commands to apache with apache2ctl (#634414) Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/563452 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/634414 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6 www-servers/apache/Manifest | 2 + www-servers/apache/apache-2.4.32.ebuild | 248 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 250 insertions(+)}
