Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 539124 - [Future EAPI] RECOMMENDED_USE for default use status and conditional use recommendations
Summary: [Future EAPI] RECOMMENDED_USE for default use status and conditional use reco...
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Hosted Projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: PMS/EAPI (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Package Manager Specification
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: future-eapi
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2015-02-06 16:15 UTC by Adam Feldman
Modified: 2016-02-11 22:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Adam Feldman gentoo-dev 2015-02-06 16:15:47 UTC
Primarily, the idea here that a maintainer may want to have IUSE="foo bar" and bar is recommended if foo is selected.  Currently, the only way to recommend a use flag is IUSE="+baz"  This doesn't work with the above mentioned example because IUSE="foo +bar" would recommend bar regardless of whether foo is selected or not.

For backwards compatibility, the IUSE + syntax can be maintained, but alternatively, it may be simpler, and make more sense to have something like:
IUSE="foo bar baz"
RECOMMENDED_USE="
    foo? ( bar )
    baz"
So in this example:
IUSE="baz"
RECOMMENDED_USE="baz"
is equivalent to IUSE="+baz"

The original inspiration for this idea was the following, app-emulation/wine works both with and without X.  Most users who use X would most likely want the USE flags lcms and xcomposite, but setting them + in IUSE makes compiling wine with -X more complicated, as every flag that + just for X users would have to be unset for non-X users.  The above system simplifies this by only setting + on lcms and xcomposite if X is set.

Alternatively, other names could be used, like DEFAULT_USE instead of RECOMMENDED_USE, but that is a side note to the primary point.

Any thoughts on the idea would be greatly appreciated, and thank you in advance for your time.