Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 529492 - =mail-filter/pypolicyd-spf-1.3.2-r1: stabilization
Summary: =mail-filter/pypolicyd-spf-1.3.2-r1: stabilization
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: Michael Orlitzky
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on: 529494
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2014-11-16 14:41 UTC by Michael Orlitzky
Modified: 2015-10-06 13:41 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Orlitzky gentoo-dev 2014-11-16 14:41:55 UTC
*pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1 (05 Jun 2014)

  05 Jun 2014; Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> +pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1.ebuild,
  -pypolicyd-spf-1.3.ebuild:
  Version bump; remove v1.3 due to upstream bug #1325579.
Comment 1 floppe 2015-04-01 07:16:43 UTC
dev-python/pyspf-2.0.10 breaks current stable mail-filter/pypolicyd-spf-1.1, I think.

Trace callback about addr2bin.
Comment 2 Michael Orlitzky gentoo-dev 2015-04-01 14:15:29 UTC
(In reply to floppe from comment #1)
> dev-python/pyspf-2.0.10 breaks current stable mail-filter/pypolicyd-spf-1.1,
> I think.
> 
> Trace callback about addr2bin.

Yeah, I know, sorry. This bug depends on bug #529494 where another problem with pyspf-2.0.10 is reported. I'd really like pyspf-2.0.11 to go stable so that I can stabilize the new pypolicyd-spf, but they're  both stuck waiting on pydns (bug #532318).

As soon as I can, I'll CC the arches to get this done.
Comment 3 Mark LaCroix 2015-04-02 23:20:22 UTC
Encountered this today. In my case it caused mails to be rejected. Very bad.

https://answers.launchpad.net/pypolicyd-spf/+question/232582

According to the maintainer, pyspf 2.0.8 is what broke pypolicyd-spf prior to 1.2

This should be addressed ASAP since it can cause rejections
Comment 4 Michael Orlitzky gentoo-dev 2015-04-06 00:37:54 UTC
(In reply to Mark LaCroix from comment #3)
> 
> According to the maintainer, pyspf 2.0.8 is what broke pypolicyd-spf prior
> to 1.2
> 
> This should be addressed ASAP since it can cause rejections

I'm not the maintainer for pyspf or pydns, nor am I on the arch teams, so I'm not allowed to stabilize those packages. I agree this should be fixed ASAP, but the best place to complain is on those two bugs I mentioned.

The arch teams may have a priority list of packages to stabilize, and I'm sure they have no idea that those two are particularly important.
Comment 5 Alarig Le Lay 2015-04-30 11:14:16 UTC
I also think that the version 1.3.1 should be stabilised. The actual stable version does not work very well when the upgrade in 1.3.1 solved the problem as said in https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7738960
Comment 6 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2015-06-02 08:51:01 UTC
arches are already CCed in blocking bug :)
Comment 7 Justin Snelgrove 2015-07-26 21:51:39 UTC
The current stable tree is now broken in a way that can cause mail rejections on upgrade. This should have been stabilized alongside pyspf, but wasn't.
Comment 8 Robert Trace 2015-09-23 01:11:36 UTC
I tested 1.3.2-r1 for bug #559364 and everything looks good with only python3.

Thanks for the fix, Michael.
Comment 9 Michael Orlitzky gentoo-dev 2015-09-23 01:33:40 UTC
It hasn't been 30 days yet, but:

* By the time bug #529494 is resolved, it will have been.
* There's a known conflict with v1.3.1.

So I'm changing this stablereq to target the latest version.
Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2015-09-24 14:01:03 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2015-09-25 14:30:59 UTC
x86 stable