Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 52463 - bmeps-1.2.5 (new ebuild)
Summary: bmeps-1.2.5 (new ebuild)
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High enhancement
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL: http://bmeps.sourceforge.net
Whiteboard: sunrise suggested
Keywords: EBUILD
: 107995 201657 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 201659
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-05-30 07:47 UTC by Christian Gut
Modified: 2012-01-15 18:12 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
media-gfx/bmeps-1.0.7a.ebuild (bmeps-1.0.7a.ebuild,725 bytes, text/plain)
2004-05-30 07:48 UTC, Christian Gut
Details
bmeps-1.1.0.ebuild (bmeps-1.1.0.ebuild,726 bytes, text/plain)
2004-10-10 18:52 UTC, Christian Gut
Details
bmeps-1.2.5.ebuild Ebuild for BMEPS revised (bmeps-1.2.5.ebuild,673 bytes, text/plain)
2005-10-03 10:51 UTC, Mathias Weigt
Details
bmeps-2.0.3.ebuild (bmeps-2.0.3.ebuild,735 bytes, text/plain)
2007-12-08 19:24 UTC, cJ
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christian Gut 2004-05-30 07:47:27 UTC
The bmeps package contains a command line program and a library to convert bitmap image files (PNG/JPEG/NetPBM) to EPS. EPS level 1, 2 and 3 can be used.
Depending on the EPS level there are different compression and encoding algorithms available:

    * run-length-compression (2 and above)
    * flate compression (3 and above)
    * ASCII-85-encoding instead of ASCII-Hex (2 and above)

The program is intended to be used with LaTeX/dvips or other DTP software accepting EPS graphics.
No automated scaling/rotating is done by the program to fit pages of any paper size, this is left up to the DTP application including the graphics.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Christian Gut 2004-05-30 07:48:32 UTC
Created attachment 32320 [details]
media-gfx/bmeps-1.0.7a.ebuild

repoman says ok
Comment 2 Christian Gut 2004-10-10 18:52:13 UTC
Created attachment 41495 [details]
bmeps-1.1.0.ebuild

little change in the naming theme for the package - otherwise version bump
Comment 3 Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-11-15 00:09:42 UTC
Please check the latest ebuild header, see
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=3
for valid header (we no longer use Gentoo
Technologies, Inc.).

Also, netpbm dependency is missing from
your ebuild, though it seems necessary
because of the sed line to force -lnetpbm.

Other parts seem alright and clean
(though I haven't tested it yet).

Does anyone mind if I take it?
Comment 4 Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-15 12:42:21 UTC
bmeps-1.2.2 is released meanwhile
Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-27 16:39:51 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does anyone mind if I take it?

Are you still interested in this ebuild?
Comment 6 Christian Gut 2005-07-27 23:50:26 UTC
Yes, would be great we can get it into the tree. That app is very usefull if you
do a lot in latex.
Comment 7 Ciaran McCreesh 2005-09-13 18:48:38 UTC
Please fix the following and reopen:

* The configure sed line should go in src_unpack. Ideally you should modify
configure.{in,ac} rather than configure.
* http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/docfiles.txt
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-03 10:12:07 UTC
*** Bug 107995 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Mathias Weigt 2005-10-03 10:51:36 UTC
Created attachment 69794 [details]
bmeps-1.2.5.ebuild Ebuild for BMEPS revised

I accidently opened a new bug for this ebuild before I saw that it already
exists. Anyway as this one is a bit outdated here is a new ebuild for bmeps.
The sed trick is not necessary anymore as the author changed this already.
Mathias
Comment 10 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-03 11:11:24 UTC
Reopen.
Comment 11 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-08 08:59:09 UTC
*** Bug 201657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 cJ 2007-12-08 19:24:13 UTC
Created attachment 138052 [details]
bmeps-2.0.3.ebuild

From duplicate bug : added ebuild for the 1->2 version bump.
See bug #201659 for a new dependancy.
Comment 13 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2009-01-08 16:12:11 UTC
(this is an automated message based on filtering criteria that matched this bug)

Hello, The Gentoo Team would like to firstly thank you for your ebuild
submission. We also apologize for not being able to accommodate you in a timely
manner. There are simply too many new packages.

Allow me to use this opportunity to introduce you to Gentoo Sunrise. The sunrise overlay[1] is a overlay for Gentoo which we allow trusted users to commit to and all users can have ebuilds reviewed by Gentoo devs for entry into the overlay.
So, the sunrise team is suggesting that you look into this and submit your
ebuild to the overlay where even *you* can commit to. =)

Because this is a mass message, we are also asking you to be patient with us. We anticipate a large number of requests in a short time. 

Thanks,
On behalf of the Gentoo Sunrise Team,
Jeremy.

[1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/sunrise/
[2]: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq
Comment 14 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2011-06-03 21:19:52 UTC
No comments for > 3 years - is anyone still interested in this?
Comment 15 Mathias Weigt 2011-06-04 13:51:56 UTC
I'm not. Also bmeps is now part of a bigger package: dktools. So I'm not sure if this ebuild is still working. I'd suggest that anyone who needs it creates a new ebuild for dktools.
Comment 16 cJ 2011-06-04 14:05:11 UTC
Me don't care anymore and remembers building it was too much a PITA for what it is.
Comment 17 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2012-01-15 18:12:55 UTC
(In reply to comment #14)
> No comments for > 3 years - is anyone still interested in this?

(In reply to comment #15)
> I'm not. Also bmeps is now part of a bigger package: dktools. So I'm not sure
> if this ebuild is still working. I'd suggest that anyone who needs it creates a
> new ebuild for dktools.

(In reply to comment #16)
> Me don't care anymore and remembers building it was too much a PITA for what it
> is.

OK resolving then.